+THE GENEVA CONVENTION – WE NEED WORDS TO PROTECT ABUSED CHILDREN

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Having just posted +WHAT MY MOTHER FORGOT TO WRITE IN HER NOVEMBER 1957 LETTERS, which follows the series of selections from my mother’s letters last week about me, ‘my clothes’ and my grandmother has led me in one direction, and one direction only.  While NO child should EVER have to experience abuse of any kind – no PERSON – abuse does continue to happen.

As I work toward the publication of my books I am realizing that some child abuse (and other domestic abuse situations) lie closer in their reality to conditions surrounding being held as a Prisoner of War than they do to any other situation we could think of.

I am including in this post the wording at the beginning of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.  Victims of severe infant-child abuse and other domestic violence victims are attacked by armed force.  While I don’t know if anyone has come up with a version of the Convention’s wording as it might relate to civilian attack, even reading these words as they were designed to address circumstances of adult armed conflict gives me a lot to think about as a survivor of my mother’s nearly unimaginable attacks of abuse against me over the 18 years of my infant-childhood.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From the University of Minnesota Human Rights Library

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950.

PART I

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1

The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.

Article 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peace time, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.

The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.

Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.

Article 3

In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) Taking of hostages;

(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment;

(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

2. The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.

An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.

The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention.

The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict.

Article 4

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.

4. Persons who accompany the armed forces without actually being members thereof, such as civilian members of military aircraft crews, war correspondents, supply contractors, members of labour units or of services responsible for the welfare of the armed forces, provided that they have received authorization from the armed forces which they accompany, who shall provide them for that purpose with an identity card similar to the annexed model.

5. Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.

6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.

B. The following shall likewise be treated as prisoners of war under the present Convention:

1. Persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of the occupied country, if the occupying Power considers it necessary by reason of such allegiance to intern them, even though it has originally liberated them while hostilities were going on outside the territory it occupies, in particular where such persons have made an unsuccessful attempt to rejoin the armed forces to which they belong and which are engaged in combat, or where they fail to comply with a summons made to them with a view to internment.

2. The persons belonging to one of the categories enumerated in the present Article, who have been received by neutral or non-belligerent Powers on their territory and whom these Powers are required to intern under international law, without prejudice to any more favourable treatment which these Powers may choose to give and with the exception of Articles 8, 10, 15, 30, fifth paragraph, 58-67, 92, 126 and, where diplomatic relations exist between the Parties to the conflict and the neutral or non-belligerent Power concerned, those Articles concerning the Protecting Power. Where such diplomatic relations exist, the Parties to a conflict on whom these persons depend shall be allowed to perform towards them the functions of a Protecting Power as provided in the present Convention, without prejudice to the functions which these Parties normally exercise in conformity with diplomatic and consular usage and treaties.

C. This Article shall in no way affect the status of medical personnel and chaplains as provided for in Article 33 of the present Convention.

Article 5

The present Convention shall apply to the persons referred to in Article 4 from the time they fall into the power of the enemy and until their final release and repatriation.

Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal.

READ REST HERE

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+WHAT MY MOTHER FORGOT TO WRITE IN HER NOVEMBER 1957 LETTERS

++++++++++++++++++++

This is what my mother forgot to say in her letters to her mother in November of 1957, two months after my sixth birthday when I was in the first grade.  She forgot to tell her mother that she had beat her skinny little daughter so hard that she could barely stand up and until it really hurt her to sit down.

She forgot to say that she left bleeding gashes in her little girl’s arm from digging her sharp fingernails into her skin as she dragged her around the kitchen while she beat her with her other fist.  She forgot to say that she slapped her face so hard it made her little girl’s nose bleed all over her crying face and into her mouth.  She forgot to say that she screamed her rage so loudly that if there had been any neighbors in hearing range maybe they would have come racing through the woods to see what all the terrible noise was about.

She forgot to say that she propped her little girl on the tall kitchen stool in the dark back hall and made her sit there while she returned to the kitchen to make everyone else some supper.  She forgot to say that the rest of the family ate all that good smelling food but Linda didn’t get any.  She forgot to say that Linda was ignored by everyone, even her father, not only during supper, but for all the time the dishes were being washed and the others watched TV and then went to happily off to bed after all the lights were turned off.

She forgot to say that her firstborn little girl spent the whole night awake even though she was very tired, sitting on that stool.  She forgot to say that her little girl’s stomach hurt very much, not because she was still so hungry, but because the terror stayed in there growing and growing and growing.

She forgot to say that her little girl needed to go to the bathroom but stayed frozen on that stool, terrified to move because she had been told to SIT THERE OR ELSE.

She forgot to say that she was a stupid, evil, very mean mother for buying a little girl who traveled more than two hours a day on a filthy Alaskan school bus some city girl’s turquoise jacket with white fake fur ruffs on the sleeves and around the bottom edges and inside the hood.  She forgot to say that it was IMPOSSIBLE for this little girl to find a way to keep this jacket clean but that didn’t matter and nobody told Linda THAT.

++++++++++++++++++++

+FOUND THE LETTER – not a good one

++++++++++++++++

Filling in the blank spots, and this one is about the turquoise coat – this letter was in the ziplock of undated letters – figured out where it goes [I had just turned 6, first grade]:

November 11, 1957

“Linda is driving us crazy.  Mom she’s a TOM BOY and acts as such at school.  I’m determined for her not to wear levis to school (most do).  But she ruins everything she wears:  tears, holes, ground in dirt.  She’s harder on clothes than John is!  I don’t dare let her wear skirt you sent except to Sunday school!  I’ve lectured, explained, preached and spanked.  Well, she no longer lies – I’m thankful for that and is sweet and helpful in house but oh you should see her come home!

Her beautiful turquoise jacket and white fur is filthy.  First day she ruined it, I washed it heartbroken (it’s a beauty and expensive) and made her wear old jacket for one week.  Then let her wear it again – same thing – and always blames other children!  I gave up.

Then I bought her a lovely pair of garbardine [sic] beige pants and plaid flannel – 5.00 and I need some myself as I only own levis (one pair).  Yesterday she came home and two holes right through in knees.  I never would’ve treated my clothes like that!

So levis for her!!  And she doesn’t care!  Why try?

Today I’m going to try to get refund on lay-a-way of her clothes to apply to others.  It’s no use – we can’t afford to buy her things to ruin first day.  Maybe when she’s older she’ll care!

Meanwhile oh how I need things.  I don’t even have overshoes yet – whole family is outfitted and I have no winter coat even or wool slacks.  I’m tired of it, believe me and Bill says nothing ‘til I have money.  Meanwhile Linda ruins her clothes! ! ! !

Well, from now on I think more of myself and less for her! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Must close.  Much love Mom and thanks a million for your letters.  Give love to Cahills and next I write to Charlie.  Give HIM my love Please!

P.S.  Forgot to tell you she was crawling on cement on school pretending she was a dog! ?”

+++++++++++++++++++++

*Age 6 – Mother’s letter – purchase of the turquoise coat

*Age 6 – Jan. 1958 First Grade in Mother’s Letters

++++++++++++++++

+MY LESSON TODAY FROM THE ROSES: WHY MY LOVE RELATIONSHIPS FAILED

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I have been laying an adobe block ring around the Pomegranate tree today, which has placed me in an area of my yard working closest to the Ballerina Rose that is planted at the center of my walkway circle nearest what will hopefully be the door to my some-day adobe chapel.  Perhaps by spending this time today so nearby the roses, I have learned something new so that I can think about myself in a different way.

The Ballerina Rose grows on its OWN root.  It is not a rose that is grafted onto some other rose’s root not its own.  This means, as I’ve mentioned before, that unlike the grafted roses, the Ballerina can be reproduced from cuttings of itself.

As I pondered this difference between the roses I realized that all four of the ‘major’ love relationships I have had with men in my life were doomed to failure all for the same, single reason.  In relationship with each of these men I tried to graft myself onto THEIR root stock because I had no idea how to grow from my own root.

The first man I fell in love with when I was 18, the father of my firstborn child, was a California golden boy.  He was four years older than I was, brilliant, gorgeous  (beautiful tanned skin, sun-bleached blond hair, tall, well built), a popular playboy who knew how to party and enjoy himself, interact with other people, and came from a family with money.

The second man I met around age 20, the father of my second child, was also popular and well-liked.  He was calm and kind and gentle, dependable and a hard worker.  He had ‘roots’ around Fargo, North Dakota and I was convinced of two things:  He would be a wonderful father and I could stabilize my life by tying myself to him and his family as if he was my personal Rock of Gibraltar.

The third important man in my life I met when I was about 35.  He was Native American, and I thought he was ‘spiritual’.  I believed he was anchored into a heritage on this continent and with the earth that meant we could relate to one another from our souls.  He was ‘psychic’ and gifted in many ways, a Vietnam PTSD war veteran, but seemed to me wise and gifted.

The fourth man I met at the end of my 40s.  He is 17 years older than I am, has worked his same job for 55 years and has never left this small town area where he was born.  He seemed solid, wise and also stable and I counted on his perspective and insights on everything I ever chose to talk with him about.  I am still in love with this man though this relationship was obviously always doomed in terms of lack of commitment.

++++

I married and divorced the first two men.  None of these men are healthy and happy.  With the exception of the second man, the other three all came from very wounding childhoods.

But the lesson I am paying attention to today from the rose plants is that it wasn’t what I might have shared in common with any of these men that led to failed relationship.  I was looking in each case for a root I could attach and graft myself onto that represented what I felt I lacked within myself.  I was not growing from my own root as does the Ballerina Rose.

In my adult life I’ve never been able to ‘get away with’ anything or very long.  I don’t seem to have any kind of ‘luxury’ to fool myself, or wander very far down a ‘wrong road’.  It has been very difficult for me to realize that the abuse of my childhood meant that not only could I not grow my own branches out into the world, but I also had great difficulty growing my own healthy roots – MY OWN roots so that I would not have been misled into thinking I could ‘borrow’ from these men some part of THEIR life and being because I could not find what I needed in any other way.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+SURVIVING MY MOTHER’S HATE – HER WORDS AND MINE

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What can I possibly say in response to or in rebuttal against my mother’s words as posted earlier in +ANOTHER ‘NASTY GRAM’ FROM MY MOTHER TO HER MOTHER RE: 6 YEAR OLD ME:

November 26, 1957 Tuesday

Dear Mother,

I am glad I wrote my recent letter and hope you fully understand so I won’t have to repeat myself in the future.  You’ve always been far overly concerned with LINDA’S actions anyways.  I am not nearly as concerned with ‘tom boyishness’ which is not as prevalent now anyways as with poor behavior in school and traits and personality.  It takes far more anyways than ‘a pretty dress and a pretty face’ to be nice. ”

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Because I actually FOUND these words written in my mother’s handwriting across a 50+ year old piece of paper the other night, they are now visibly lodged in my waking mind rather than ONLY being carved into my ‘invisible being’.

What these words reflect is my mother’s HATE for me.  They reflect the fact that I was born DOOMED as her daughter to a life in hell.  What these words reflect is the fact that my grandmother was the ONLY person in the universe who knew that fact.  Our move to Alaska effectively removed my grandmother’s influence from my life as I have mentioned before, yet his letter my mother wrote  even further banished Grandmother into the remotest distance away from me.

There is no place far enough away in the universe that I can run to or hide in to make these words go away, as much as I might wish to or think I SHOULD be able to escape them now.  It is the echo of these words within every fiber of my being that bothers me now.  I want to ignore them.  I want to pretend that things were somehow ‘different’ for me from the time I was born – but 18 years in hell, as I tried to grow and develop my body-brain-mind-self is a long, long, long time.

Every time during those 18 years that I tried to grow even the tiniest part of who Linda is – into my self and into the world – SHE was there to bash me, to crash me, to smash me.  HATE is a destructive power nearly beyond imagination, especially when an infant-child is hated by its own mother (and father, in my case).

The fact that I was at least able to access a little tiny bit of my Grandmother’s concern and affection (even though she must have had a major influence on creating the monster my mother was from the start) before I turned six when we left Los Angeles and moved to Alaska was the only life preserver I ever had except for the love my 14-month-older than me brother radiated upon me.

My body-brain internalized my grandmother’s influence on my behalf, but it clear as day that my mother HATED the fact that my grandmother loved me.  How could she NOT, given the fact that much of my mother’s demise was rooted in the ways and times that her mother despised her as she grew and formed.

++++

I don’t feel like I am standing at the gates of hell gazing at the devouring inferno’s flames as I try to write something in response to these words of my mother’s I just found in her letter.  I feel like I am standing in hell’s inferno itself, and there is nothing I can do to stop that fact because I have the first years’ of my life experience being exactly in that place.

But what about today?  I have a thought about burls growing on some trees in some forests.  I remember seeing those burls carved into bowls.  Those burls hold the most interesting and beautiful patterns of wandering wood grain within them.  I didn’t know as a child what formed those burls.  I guess I don’t really even know now.  But at least I have a glimmer of a grasp on the process.

As some trees grow in the forest, and send out their tiny new branches, sometimes something happens that causes the branch to turn around so that instead of it growing freely in its extension out into the air freely, it turns around and begins to grow back into itself.  That’s where those wandering lines of grain within the burls come from.

I feel like one of those burls this morning.  I can see that the resiliency of who I am and how I am in the world (and have been since I ‘got made’) – coupled with what little support I could glean from my brother and my grandmother – kept me alive so that I could endure and survive my mother.  But I had to grow my branches inward where my mother could not get to them-me – as best as I could.

Knowing that fact, and knowing my growing process was probably very similar to any other severe infant-child abuse survivor’s – I can see that within us is held the most beautiful patterns and lines, colors and swirls, the most spectacular wonder in the tracks of our survival that appear in the ‘burl’ that is us – that anyone could imagine.

A tree branch that turns around and grows into itself cannot be as easily seen as a fully stretched and reaching branch.  It is compact, and less vulnerable.  We (survivors) grew closest to the trunk that contains our very life force within it.  We grew closest to the root source that fed us life then and feeds us life now.  We must ACTUALLY have the very shortest route to take to find out who we truly as are separate, unique and wonderful individuals because we did not get to grow ourselves in any extended far reach into ‘that world out there’.

We perhaps did not lose ourselves in that outside world the way others who could romp and play, grow and thrive while being loved, cherished, supported, encouraged from the time they were born.  We are tough.  The wood grain of a burl is dense and hard, being close to a rock than any vegetable matter.  We had to be that strong, that tough, that endurable, that unbreakable, that self- and inwardly-protected – – and THIS special, unique and beautiful.

Which brings me back in my thoughts to my mother’s few brief words in her letter to her mother about me and my relationship both to my mother and to my grandmother.  There is an unbelievable universe of terrible abuse contained in those few words – as if they contain the terrible dark and destructive seed that was my mother’s hatred.  At the same time I read them, at the same time I can feel all the echoing and resonance within this body-brain-mind-self that formed itself within THAT hell, I also know that nothing my mother ever did to me – or ever could possibly do – could in any way remove from me ANY portion of who I AM as a human being.

My mother’s treatment of me DID change HOW I am in my lifetime because her treatment of me changed the way I physiologically grew and developed.  But she did not change ME.  I just grew into a different kind of branch, one with most of its health and beauty held close within me on the inside – exactly where she could never actually reach me.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+TRAUMA DRAMA REENACTMENTS CONTINUE IN AN UNSAFE AND INSECURE WORLD

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I remember as a little girl living in the Los Angeles area being in the car when my parents passed road construction projects where steam rollers were being used.  I was fascinated by them, and even though of course I didn’t know it, it is very possible that my imagination recognized the metaphor contained within the actions of this monstrous piece of machinery that was designed specifically to roll over and completely flatten anything within its path.

My Mother the Steam Roller.  That’s just ONE of the things my mother was very good at:  flattening the life out of anyone in her way.  She flattened me, and I must have been aware of how effective my mother was at flattening my grandmother any time my grandmother tried in any way to say something or do something ‘nice’ for or about me.

Actually it never mattered WHO it was who might have tried to cross my mother.  My mother was a predatory fighter and could with ease flatten anyone within her family just like she was this piece of equipment — a steam roller.

++++

I will need to spend quite a bit of time eventually with the letter I posted last evening in +”GRANDMOTHER GETS A NEW CAR” – AND . . . . . because it contains so much information about my mother and her relationships with family.  From the stories my mother repeatedly told about how mean both her mother and her brother were to her in her childhood, I can see both of them also as if they were steam rollers who steam rolled right over my mother.  She was not empowered to fight back against them when she was young (even all the way into her teens).

But what a way to live.  What a way to CONTINUE to live, always being at war with those a person is supposed to feel most safe and secure with, most loved and cherished and cared about by.  I found myself thinking as I dug my way through the transcription of my mother’s words last night, “Is EVERYONE’S family like mine?  Does everyone have patterns of insecure attachment, of trouble and pain, sorrow and suffering, of war and inner emotional blackmail, hostage-taking, kidnapping of the soul, brutalization of the imagination, blocking and distortion of gifts and talents, destruction of relationships that my entire family and its history seems to have contained within it?

That led me to wondering how many people read on this blog with the words, “That could have happened in my family” ringing in their thoughts?  Different times, different participants, different versions of trauma drama, but trauma drama and terribly insecure human-to-human attachments just the same.

++++

It might seem like an odd connection, but this information is not randomly dragged into this post.  If you Google search for the terms ‘Israel genetics dance’ you will find some amazing research about the new discoveries about how there IS a genetic link between ‘professional dancers’ and their genes evidently related to this very ancient human activity –DANCE.

I mention this in connection with my mother’s letter I posted last night because I wish I could discover research about genetics and drama like I accidentally discovered the research about genetics and dance.  If there truly IS a genetic ‘loading’ for dramatic abilities just as there is for dancing, then I would suspect that my mother, as the amazing trauma drama specialist that she was, had those genes.

After all, human expression through gesture and sound, movement and pantomime, and reenactment of experience belongs to our species way back to our ancient beginnings – way back to before we had the ability to speak to one another with anything like a word.  Stories were transmitted, told, expressed, conveyed in all kinds of ways without words, and today we STILL watch this happen or participate in these trauma dramas if we happen to have been born into a family where the WORDS expressing the truth about trauma resounded in their empty silence.

++++

This leads me to the important insight that came to me last night about the trauma drama reenactment patterns in my mother’s life as they operated around her nearly continual moving around.  I have noted before that I think my mother projected ‘imaginary friends’ and ‘the imaginary enemy (me)’ onto her children.  She resonated with her infants as being her play baby dolls.  But what I didn’t GET until last night as I transcribed the letter I posted is that IN HER MOVING SHE WAS PLAYING HOUSE.

I had a “Duh, Linda!” moment!  Of COURSE that’s what she was doing.  I only SAW this last night because I was working my way through a collection of letters I had saved separately in a ziplock bag throughout the years that I have been ordering and organizing my mother’s collection of writings.  As I’ve mentioned before, it strikes me as being so unbelievably strange that all the while my mother wrote these letters over the years she ALWAYS intended to ‘put them into a book’.  Yet NEVER did she actually DATE a single one of them!

Often she put the day of the week on the letter, and most letters are at least contained in an original envelope with a post mark.  But this ziplock bag collection contained letters and parts of letters that had NO indication of date for me to work with.  I had to wait until the entire body of my mother’s letters was put into the best order I could make of them before I could add these letters into the newly coherent story I am forming of my mother’s words (and of her offspring’s childhood).

So, the letter that I posted last night was one of these ‘floating’ letters.  As I added it into the main body of the sort-of-coherent story of my mother’s life contained in her letters, I was FINALLY able to GET IT.

If you were to read through this collection of letters as I have transcribed them thus far (and there still might be missing letters to add into these files), you will see the pattern of my mother’s playing-house-by-constant-moving-around that I am talking about:

While I am not going back at this moment for the exact late June-early July letters where she begins to tell my father that she is moving herself and four children out of the one-room motel living situation into a rental house that she found in Glendora, you will see those letters as they describe her ‘playing house psychosis’.

She describes how she can NOW make a temporary cozy home (meaning safe and secure for herself) in that rented house.  But it doesn’t take long after she’s managed to accomplish the MOVE itself into that house that her whole fantasy begins to disintegrate, crumble and fall apart.  As this begins to happen my mother summons – as she ALWAYS did no matter WHAT household move trauma drama she was enacting – all the supposedly LOGICALLY BASED reasons why she HAS to make the move.

As readers it is time to take our stand and begin to understand that my mother’s madness was NEVER about logical reason.  My mother was not reason-able.  At least in this letter I posted of hers last night she is able to plead with and beg my father to help her.  Most often she so completely disguised her ‘mission’ that she fooled even my supposedly ‘reason-able’ father to move right along with her.

Because (even though I lived through 18 years of moving with my parents) I ONLY saw the pattern last night of the Fairy Tale nature of my mother’s PLAYING HOUSE with her imaginary friends, enemies (which came to include members of her family and other people other than just me), and doll babies exactly as I dropped this very important letter I was transcribing into its ‘coherency slot’ within her story I can finally say, “I get the whole picture.”

Human beings are born with the genetic capability to use our specie’s dramatic imagination in the process of becoming people who live within a massive web of drama that includes all of life.  We are supposed to develop a stable-self-core that allows us to make good sense of the constant interactions that are going on as we are forming within our earliest caregiver-attachment environments.

When these interactions, when our earliest body-brain forming attachment environment is malevolent, the nature of trauma drama begins to form itself into the patterns of our body-brain – and therefore into the life we live.  We can ‘clinicalize’ and ‘sanitize’ and ‘legitimize’ how we choose to talk about the end results of forming a body-brain-self-life within malevolent early environments, but in the end we are simply being prepared in a trauma-drama world to live a trauma-drama reenactment life – UNTIL WE LEARN THE LESSONS THE TRAUMA IS TRYING TO TEACH OUR ENTIRE SPECIES, not ‘just’ the individual members who ‘play the parts’ in this great drama that is the ongoing life of our species.

A trauma drama life is not a coherent one if the lessons contained within the drama itself are never learned.  It is only as we learn these lessons that words can begin to dissipate the vague fog of illusion that envelope the ongoing dramas themselves.

My very young mother, already as an infant being neglected if not also abused, was left isolated and all alone in a world with her dolls and her story books to try to figure out what SHE and her life – as well as that of other people – meant and how it all fit together.  Yet when I think about how in our specie’s ancient beginnings there were no warnings about keeping children away from the ongoing reenactments of trauma drama that the other members of our ‘family’ and ‘tribe’ were demonstrating, I realize that there is no corresponding magical line within the human brain-psyche that says ‘this dramatic reenactment belongs to childhood’ and ‘this dramatic reenactment belongs to adulthood’.

All the story telling and story acting belongs to the same mythic imagination that IS human life.  The psychologist Carl Jung might have divided the main characters in human drama into what he called archetypes, but in the end all the individual parts that CAN be played by humans in human drama simply either act themselves out in ongoing dramas OR are talked about in ongoing stories.

The evolutionary advantage for our entire species is the same one that operates for us each as individuals:  Trauma has something to teach us.  If the lessons are not learned they will continue to act themselves out until somebody ‘gets it’.  The GETTING of the lessons of trauma happen when we get to the more evolutionary advanced level of being able to USE WORDS to convey to our own self and to others what the traumas ARE and what they are teaching us.

++++

In the case of my mother – as I am now quite convinced is the case for every single human being – the MAIN theme of every drama and story of our life is about how safe and secure the world is for us to be living in.  The ongoing drama-story of our life IS about degrees of safe and secure attachment in the world – or degrees of its opposite.  The kicker is, though, that the messages are NEVER JUST meant either for the individual people who endured and survived traumas, or even for the immediate peer generation that individual is a part of.

The messages of degrees of trauma, of degrees of safe and secure attachment to and within the world are telling about the STATE OF THE WORLD, the condition of the external environment because it is THAT state of the world that the future generations are going to be left to survive in and better know something about.

We have to learn how to ‘read’ trauma and the dramatic reenactments trauma creates when it remains unresolved.  In its unresolved state the critical information about continued survival of the individual AND the species to which it belongs is NOT being understood.  Without learning something from trauma about survival the trauma will simply continue to be included in the patterns of life itself as these patterns repeat themselves like persistent and obvious nightmares until somebody pays attention.

++++

Nobody looked from the outside (or from the inside) at the patterns of trauma drama that unfolded within my family of origin and recognized what was going on.  Nobody said, “Gee, that family moves around too much, what’s wrong?”  Nobody said, “Gee, those children are not happy, what’s wrong?”  Nobody said, “Boy, that one little girl named Linda is the absolute picture of being lost, frightened and forlorn, what’s wrong?”

Nobody pierced through the smokescreen illusion of make-believe justification for all of the abuse, all of the moves, all of the madness that WAS the trauma-drama reenactment that WAS our family’s life.  Did any of it matter?  Did it matter that lives were being flattened within my family?  Did it matter that potential for joy, health, self-directed expression of talent and potential for a lifetime of well-being had been destroyed and continued to be destroyed within the horrible trauma drama reenactment that WAS our family?

No, evidently it didn’t matter.  Nobody saw any reason to pay attention, ask any questions, become involved, find a way to STOP what was going on.  It evidently wasn’t anyone else’s business.

But if we think we want to help prevent and STOP infant and child abuse we will have to cross that imaginary line between giving a damn and not giving a damn about the messages that trauma drama reenactments continue to convey within child-abusing — within ANY abusing — environments.  We have to allow ourselves to understand that the messages contained in these traumatic dramas are for ALL of us, not only for those who are captive within them.

The messages trauma conveys are ALWAYS about the degrees of safety, security and well-being that exist in the whole world, and are NOT SIMPLY messages about the conditions within any single family.  The human drama, the good and the bad of it, involve and belong to every member of our species.  Trauma itself is like a steam roller smashing the joy and well-being out of every member of every generation that remains in its path until somebody, somewhere, at some time FINALLY notices, pays attention and reads the signals contained within the trauma drama reenactments that tell us all what is WRONG in the world so that we can ALL do something to make what is WRONG in the world we all share  – well, quite simply, RIGHT.

This healing will not happen unless and until we find and use WORDS to think about and to talk about what needs to be changed to end as many traumas as we can so that we can make everyone’s world a safer and more secure place to be throughout everyone’s life span.  Is this too much to hope for, too much to ask for?

Nope.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+A RARE ‘MORE HONEST’ 1957 LETTER BY MOTHER TO HER MOTHER INVOLVING ME

+++++++++++++++

Part of a November 20, 1957 letter Mother wrote to her mother – probably in reference to what happened with the white ruffs on my parka the year I was in first grade (having just turned 6):

“Also please let’s straighten out matter of Linda once and for all.

No. I I did not write to you for advise!!!

No. II  Linda has always been dressed feminine and given as many (if not more) advantages as any girl!!

No. III  I did buy her more clothes this year and a prettier and more expensive jacket on purpose to make her feel feminine – with NO AVAIL!!  She still wears dresses to school and always does look nice! – when she leaves home!

No. IV  She looked nice up until two because she was in a play pen and stroller!!  — So does Sharon NOW!

ENOUGH SAID except please don’t pass on unwanted un needed advise air-mail please, concerning children – I only mentioned it to let you know that she is not taking care of her clothes and I feel should not wear expensive clothes until she takes care of what she now wears!!  For no other reason.

Linda always was kept nice and still is.  Her hair has always been clean and shining (no child of mine will ever have a permanent in first grade!) and her nails have always been manicured.  I have three girls and you had one – I think I am capable of caring for girls – thank you!  If you want to give advise and must why don’t you give it to Carolyn, seems Sandra [my mother’s only brother’s daughter] needs it, Linda looks feminine and always will just hasn’t matured fully but in time I’m sure she will – and never could or would be like Mimi, Diana or boyish girl you mentioned (but Sandra may – dancing lessons or not).  Probably dieting and less fussy, expensive clothes would do Sandra more good than dancing lessons at 4!!  See I have my ideas too only the difference is I keep my suggestions to myself unless asked for and usually then too as most people don’t relish advise asked for or not asked for (your clients excepted!!)

WHEW – well that’s off my chest.  You’ve always interfered with Linda and probably more reason I’ve had difficulties with her in past than her wearing levis in Glendora.

Sorry if this hurts but next summer I don’t want fusses such as in past over your well meant but unwanted suggestions.

Remember I’ll be 32 in December – not 2!  [all written very large on paper]

Love, Mildred

P.S.  I  When my temperature simmers down in a few days I’ll write a letter.”

+++++++++++++++

Relates to my “Night On the Stool” experience in these stories –

and this post:  +ONE OF MOTHER’S 1957 LETTERS – INVOLVING MY GRANDMOTHER

+++++++++++++++

+DISORGANIZED-DISORIENTED INSECURE ATTACHMENT – AT THE CORE OF ‘BORDERLINE’

+++++++++++++++++++++++

When I wrote my reply to the comment at the end of my last post, saying that with my disorganized-disoriented insecure attachment disorder I feel BETTER when I am outside organizing the dirt in my yard, feel better when I am oriented during daylight hours with my massive adobe yard project – I meant exactly what I said.

Now I had to take off my sweaty gloves and stand my shovel up against the tree so I could take a little break and come in here to my computer to write these words:

While I am not a ‘professional expert’ and cannot make any statements of fact about insecure attachments or Borderline Personality Disorder unless I dig around to find what the ‘legitimate’ researchers are saying about both conditions, I do know an awful lot about my dead Borderline mother and about myself as the survivor of her 18 years of terrible abuse.

While I believe it is possible to have a disorganized-disoriented insecure attachment ‘disorder’, or pattern set within the very early developing infant-child body-brain WITHOUT ending up with the particular constellation of physiological body-brain patterns that we name Borderline Personality Disorder, I believe that EVERY Borderline HAS a disorganized-disoriented insecure attachment ‘disorder’-pattern built within their body-brain.

I do not believe it is incorrect to say that Borderlines suffer with the following (please follow these active links for the source of these words):

The Abandonment Wound in and of Borderline Personality Disorder

At the heart of Borderline Personality Disorder lies abandonment. Abandonment trauma, abandonment depression, abandonment fears, and the deep and most primal narcissistic intra-psychic injury a human being can ever hope to survive – the core wound of abandonment.

I do, however, believe that the best hope for understanding the dynamics of this kind of wounding and the best hope for healing is naming this ‘disorder’ by the closest name we REALLY have for it – a disorganized-disoriented insecure attachment disorder.

++++++++++++

I am becoming more clear every moment I am alive now about how my attachment disorder creates the patterns by which I organize and orient my self.  This serious attachment disorder, I believe, originates when early caregiver interactions harm a developing infant-child in an unsafe and insecure attachment environment so that the development of a healthy, stable, whole autonomous SELF cannot possibly happen.  Rather than being organized and oriented within our own body-brain with good strong super highways of information flow back and forth between the world and our SELF, we pattern our lives by attaching to person, places, things, and processes that we can ASSOCIATE with rather than DISSOCIATE from.

Through this process we create our ongoing existence as we find meaning in our life.  This is what my mother did as she organized and oriented herself around her babies and children (for good and for bad), around her super housewife activities, around ‘friends’ and ‘neighbors’ who she first loved and then hated, around her husband, around the many, many locations she moved herself to – including Alaska and ‘her’ mountain homestead.

But my mother had no ability to consciously reflect upon her insecure attachment disorder.  I can now see how this same disorganized-disoriented attachment works within my own self, but I cannot make myself WELL.  Fortunately I manage to not harm others.  Fortunately I can turn my need to connect to my version of a self through work with my hands – organizing cut strips of cloth into crocheted rugs, organizing shards of old dishes I find in the abandoned city dump into mosaics, organizing letters on my keyboard into lines of text, and by organizing the dirt in my yard so that I can then organize little plants out there that I will orient myself to take care of.

+++++++++++++++

It is, then, this disorganized-disoriented insecure attachment ‘disorder-pattern’ that I was forced into developing within my own infant-child growing body-brain as I survived my mother’s terrible abuse of me that I ‘inherited’ from her (with my father’s involvement in her abuse).  Yet while I have this insecure attachment as she did, complete with all the dissociations and re-associations that it brings, I did not develop the patterns of Borderline Personality Disorder within my growing body-brain as she did.

I am very lucky, more fortunate than words can ever possibly tell, that this did not happen to me.  At the same time my life of well-being was ‘stolen’ from me, just as my mother’s was.  Until we actually NAME the insecure attachment patterns that are at the physiological foundation of Borderline Personality Disorder, I do not believe we can truly address the source-cause of BPD or recognize the damage it does to the offspring of these parents.

I can at least tell that people exist as entities unto their own self.  My mother could not do this.  She could not detect where the ‘borderline’ was that keeps people separate from one another.  She could not keep her continual and massive projections within her own mind out of the world around her.  We ALL need to understand what this really means, because it matters.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

+WHERE WAS THE CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IN MY FAMILY?

++++++++++++++++++

WARNING – THIS POST MAY TRIGGER:  Anyone with a history of sexual abuse, especially of childhood sexual abuse, may find this post extremely difficult to read.  Please take care of yourself and either don’t proceed one word farther in your reading here today, or be certain that you have the safe and secure support that you need to keep yourself safe if you CHOOSE to read further!

++++

First of all, I need to say that I do not in any way WANT to be here at this moment with my fingers on this keyboard writing the words that evidently need to be written here today.  I want to say, “This isn’t MY story!  It has nothing to do with me.  These words that want to be said, that want to be written THIS morning do not even belong to me.”

I want to run away, go outside, mix up my vinegar-water mix and pour it on my rose plants.  I want to don my dirty work clothes, put on my sunscreen, sweat band and broad rimmed straw hat and go chop the dirt away from where I know the next step has to be laid in my adobe walkway.

Yet at the same time I have to admit to myself that the story that wants to be told this morning is NOT going to go away.  It is not going to vanish.  I cannot banish this story outside of the boundaries of my yard, my house, or even out of my thoughts.  The words that must belong to this story are sticking in my mind like flies on flypaper.  The ONLY way I can stop what is growing into an inner cauldron of madness within me is to do one thing – and one thing only.  I have to write this story down.

I have very little confidence that I can tell this story right or that I can tell it well.  I think some stories don’t give a ‘rat’s ass’ about how WELL they are told.  They just demand that they be told by someone, sometime – and much too late is better than never.

All this being said, I know what I have to do next.  I have to launch into the progression of words that belong to a story that did not start with me.  Family stories.  Some family stories are easily told.  They flow along throughout the family like warm butter spreads itself across a freshly toasted piece of good bread.

Other stories, like this one, are so far beyond even being a story that its words are lodged within trauma like boulders embedded in the sides of a steep cliff’s side.  If I move even ONE SINGLE boulder from that cliff, if I begin this story with even one single world, I cannot tell what will happen next.

At the same time I believe that nothing at all is going to happen next except that I, personally, am going to be free from the talons of this story that have me grasped so firmly that I cannot get free.  I cannot move forward in time with my own thoughts, my own feelings, my own healing.  A story with claws – that’s what this one feels like.  And for some reason that I will probably not understand in my lifetime this story has found its way to ME for its telling and will not let go until I do my best to set this story – along with the words that belong to it – free.

++++

In 1989 my father began to lose his vision.  The world began to look like it was on the other side of a foggy shower door.  The result of medical examination of his condition revealed that he had a pituitary tumor that was the size of an egg.  My father did not seek any advice from his grown children who would have made certain that he got himself out of Alaska and down at least to Seattle for surgery.  He simply called us all on a Sunday evening to tell us that he was going under the knife on the morning of the next day.

My father assured us that the surgery was not going to be “any big deal.”  By the surgery was finished and my father did not then come out of intensive care ‘on time’, we all knew that something had gone terribly wrong.  After a week without any improvements, knowing my father was lying incontinent, unable to talk, not knowing who or where he was and tied to his bed, I flew from Albuquerque, New Mexico to Anchorage, Alaska to see what in the world was going on.

My father had already divorced my mother by this time, but he still financially and emotionally supported her.  My mother went even more haywire after my father’s surgery than she had ever been before.  My father had – obviously – absolutely NOTHING to give her and my mother went into a tailspin that she never pulled out from.

All I know is that during the first week after my father’s surgery the hospital and my youngest brother who lived in Anchorage were about ready to forbid my mother from entering the hospital or from ‘seeing’ my father.  One evening while I was at my father’s bedside my mother sailed into his room with words tumbling out of her mouth that I did not hear.  I ignored her, and once she saw that I was there she turned around and nearly raced from the room.

I had already ‘disowned’ my mother two years prior to this time.  This encounter with my mother was the only one I ever had after I had written that ‘disowning mother’ letter to her.  My attention was on my father.

The rest of the story that belongs to my father’s condition and what happened to him next does not belong in this story except to say that eventually the family was able to get my father out of Alaska where there were no brain trauma rehabilitation services down to Albuquerque into a new advanced facility that was able to help him improve.  What had happened to my father, primarily as a result of him not ‘bothering’ to tell the brain surgeons that he had a Factor K bleeding disorder, was that he had suffered massive brain hemorrhaging from which he could not, and did not fully recover over the remaining ten years of his life.

My father lost all his long term memory.  He could not remember his children.  He could not remember my mother.  He could not remember divorcing her.  He could not remember his career, or homesteading, or his childhood.  What my father did recover was enough of his brain to know that he was missing all of his history, and it further broke my father’s heart.

++++

After six months in the brain trauma rehabilitation hospital my father was released to my sister and her husband’s care.  They built him a large bedroom inside of their house and brought him there to tend to him.  It was this year, exactly Christmas Eve of 1991 that the rest of this story enters into this one.

Several years after this date in 1991 one of my two younger sisters, the one who had cared for my father until he was able to move into an assisted living housing arrangement, told me about the telephone call my mother had made to her on this Christmas Eve.  She also told me that Mother had told her to keep this call secret from her sisters.  Of course not long after this call both of my sisters talked to one another and found out that Mother had called both of them – told them both the same story – and told both of them that Mother said to each, “I am only telling YOU this, please do not tell your sisters.”

My mother did not include me in this dark and troubling telephone circuit BECAUSE I had cut off all contact with her.  My sisters, however, eventually did tell me about these calls.  I was completely unprepared for the information these calls contained to appear within my range of attention this week.  I had simply asked one of my sisters the other night if she had any idea what work outside of the home my mother had done during the summer of 1956.

While I was transcribing my mother and father’s June and July 1957 letters that they wrote to one another during the time my mother was still in Los Angeles and my father was In Alaska working his new job and searching for a rental we could all live in so that his family could join him, I encountered two references in my mother’s writings to this summer of 1956.

The first time it appeared as ‘that terrible summer of 1956’ with no clue what my mother was talking about.  Many letters later another reference appeared to the summer of 1956 as she mentioned that she had been working outside of the home.  I discovered no further mention of what had happened that summer to make it so ‘terrible’, so I decided to ask my sister if she remembers ever having heard anything about it.

I was NOT prepared for what she told me when I asked her this question.  The information my sister included in her answer to me brought back everything about the Christmas Eve 1991 telephone calls my mother had made to both of my sisters.

++++

Please remember the warning I posted above about the content of what follows next!

This summer of 1956 my mother evidently had taken an evening job (probably retail though none of us actually know what job it was) and left my father to care for his four children – with an age range of a small baby daughter in diapers turning one, another daughter turning three, me turning five, my brother turning six.  According to what my mother told both of my sisters on during her telephone call Christmas Eve 1991 was that during this time my father sexually molested all of his daughters.

My mother said that once she had somehow ‘found out’ (and my sisters have no memory of what she said about this discovery) my father told her that until he married my mother he ‘had never seen a girl’s private areas’, and now he was a very lucky man because he had four girls of his own he could look at and touch any time that he wanted to.

According to my mother he had told her that he had read in books that there are cultures in the world where it is the father’s responsibility to sexually initiate his daughters, and that he believed he had the right to do so himself with his daughters.

I don’t remember what details past this information my sisters told me my mother included in my mother’s telephone call twenty years ago.  What I do know is that I was not prepared to have this topic return with full force as a response to my simple question about what outside work my mother may have done on this ‘terrible summer of 1956’.

I do know that whenever it was that my sisters told me nearly twenty years ago about what my terribly distraught mother had told them in 1991 I could not process this information.  I had absolutely no way to understand any of the implications contained in my mother’s words.  The story has come back full circle now, and I had no way even now to consider any meaning related to mother’s story without talking with both of my sisters about it – again.

It is at this point that I was stuck yesterday as I spent the day digging my way down another level in my adobe walkway project.  It is at this point I am still stuck this morning as I write these words.

Both of my sisters unequivocally believe that whatever my mother’s intentions were when she called them in 1991, the story she conveyed about our father sexually molesting his daughters is not true.  Yesterday I realized that this point alone is tied to patterns of ‘false memory retrieval’.  We most often hear of victims who supposedly fabricate early abuse memories that are not true.  In this case it appears that my mother was the one who fabricated such a ‘false memory’ about her own children and their father.

At the same time while I was out slinging mud yesterday I realized that what my sisters both said in common was that our mother was trying to destroy the love and affection that her daughters had for their father.  At this time, because of the terrible consequences of my father’s permanent brain damage that had resulted from his tumor surgery, my father was completely dependent upon my sister for his care, which meant that my mother had to now adjust to two critical attachment relationship changes.

Obviously she had now completely, absolutely and forever lost her connection to my father in whatever sustaining-Mildred role he had continued to fill even after he had divorced her.  In addition, my mother might have seen that her relationship with her ‘favorite blessed God child’ was also being threatened as my sister now assumed complete care of my father.  With her disorganized-disoriented (dissociative) insecure attachment disorder, my Mother was deteriorating quickly during this time.

But what finally came clear to me as I dug down my next level of hardened clay in my yard alteration and excavation project was that while both of my sisters knew AT THE INSTANT that our mother’s words had spewed out of her mouth (yes like toxic vomit) in 1991, that they were not true, were a wild fabrication and were a lie.  They KNEW our father well enough and had strong enough bonds of trust and affection with him that they could at the same time KNOW our mother was wrong.

Unlike my sisters, I carry doubt.  I include am stuck carrying words like ‘maybe’ and ‘perhaps’ and ‘could he have’ and ‘I wonder’ inside of me attached to this entire circumstance with Mother’s story.  I do not KNOW inside of me that her words were a fabrication and DID NOT happen.

On this level, whether my father molested his daughters or not is not what matters most to me.  What matters to me most is that my father never bothered to form any kind of an attachment relationship with me like he did to his other five children.  While my sisters will still say that the relationship they had with our father never amounted to much more than a breadcrumb trail of bonding, at least they knew with certainty that our father was not the kind of man who could have POSSIBLY done what my mother reported he had done.

This leaves me today being mad as hell at my father that he never chose, for whatever reasons, to have a relationship with me.  True, my mother made every effort to influence what my father thought about me and felt toward me, but HE did make his own choices.  It seems such an almost ironical twist concerning the facts of my childhood that it would bother me this much today that HE is responsible for having created such a nonexistent relationship with me that I cannot eliminate the doubts about his treatment of his daughters the way that my sisters easily can.

It is logical and reasonable to believe that our mother WAS trying to erode the benevolent love, affection and trust my sisters felt toward our father.  I am hit full force in consideration of this whole topic with a blatantly clear fact that I was never given the opportunity to have this ‘benevolent love, affection and trust’ toward Father than my sisters not only had (and still have even though he died 10 years ago), but have always taken for granted.

This realization about what bothers me most about the whole topic is not about the sexual abuse – real or imagined.  It is about ‘something else’ that hurt me far more than I can imagine anything he MIGHT have done to me sexually when I was a little girl could have.  He participated in Mother’s reign of terror and trauma against me – and he did not care ONE SINGLE BIT about me.  THAT is a fact, not a fantasy.

++++

Which now leads me to mention that I strongly suspect that the ‘story’ our mother told my sisters about our father is about something that PROBABLY really did happen to my mother when she was a little girl.  If my mother was molested by some male or males in her family (or outside it) when she was a little girl, the closest she ever came to knowing about this truth probably happened as a projection of her mind in the form of what she told my sisters in her 1991 telephone calls.  (I have to take my sisters’ word that our Father ‘did not do it’ and ‘could not possibly have done it’ because I have no foundation of trust within me concerning him that could possibly help me to know this ‘fact’.)

If my mother was sexually molested as a small child, which I believe she was, those experiences would have directly influenced the development of the Borderline Personality Disorder that she suffered with for the rest of her life.  That my mother included specifics of not only Father looking at his daughter’s genital area but also of touching and fondling suggests to me that my mother DID have some very real personal experience with some pedophile in her life.  Who?  When?  Where?  How?  These are all questions that nobody will EVER have the answers to.

But given the old saying, “Where’s there’s smoke there’s fire,” I do not believe that any story that is ever told within a family that contains suggestion of infant-child sexual abuse can be ignored.  Somewhere within the whole gigantic mess that was my mother’s brain-mind-life, something terrible had happened to her.  For some reason, if it is only to state this single point in my writing today, The Family Story has demanded that I write it.

Now I ask for the rest of the day today may The Family Story at least leave me in peace.    I may not have told this story right, I may not have told this story well, but at least I HAVE told it.

++++++++++++++++++

+WORD WARRIOR NEWS: THE TITLE I’VE CHOSEN FOR MY MOTHER’S BOOK

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Perhaps I should feel honored that I had such a central and starring role as a player in the trauma drama that was my Borderline mother’s life.  She was, of course, not only the Leading Lady but the writer, producer and director of this trauma drama.  It is a significant problem being raised as the daughter of my mother that because I was born into my role from before the first breath of my lifetime, there was no possible way I could know that I was in a trauma drama at all!

My mother believed this drama was real and I had no choice but to believe this fantastic lie right along with her.

My guess is in severe Borderline Personality Disorder cases like my mother’s was one of the biggest problems for those whose lives are intimately intertwined with such a mother is that her Borderline constantly shifted.  For all the thousands of hours I have spent researching her ‘condition’ in her letters and writings I still have a nearly impossible task of pinpointing exactly where her Borderline actually was.

Her Borderline did not allow her to define other people (her children and mate included) as being individual and autonomous people separate from her.  ALL of us were HER CAPTIVES.  We were FORCED to play our assigned part in the never-ending trauma drama she enveloped everyone within.

Her children were her Prisoners of War.  For all the shady shifting of her Borderline mind, that fact remained consistent along with one other:  Her nearly constant moving created the shifts between the scenes of her drama.

I suspect that just as my mother projected her own mind-psyche out onto the members of her family so that we were all assigned ‘parts to play’ as characters that we could not escape from, her psyche externalized itself in her continual moving around.  The overall primary theme of my mother’s trauma drama seemed to be a ‘search for a home in heaven’.

The secondary theme that involved me as the irredeemable child of the devil was tied to her primary theme of ‘looking for a home in heaven’ – because if all the BAD in her life could be eliminated, ‘heaven’ would appear.  That all that BAD actually existed within her own mind as she then projected it onto me was simply the WAY the play unfolded.

++++

So, I have decided that I will most likely title the book of my mother’s writings,

The Many Moves of Mildred:  Her Alaskan Homesteading Tale in Letters

or “Mildred’s Many Moves”

++++

My mother’s physical moves from location to location provide the most obvious single clue that something was terribly wrong ON THE INSIDE of my mother.  The moving around cannot be ignored or rationally explained even though within the family the ‘explanations’ were always built right into the pattern of the moves as they happened.  Nobody could or did ever question her moves – we had no power to do so.

The far less obvious ‘mental moves’ of Mildred are of course much harder to detect because the Borderline that could define what these ‘other moves’ actually were as they were happening constantly moved itself!

I suspect that for every physical move my mother ever made a corresponding shift, no matter how subtle, within her mood and mental state happened along with it.  My mother used moving to regulate her emotions because she lacked the resilient capacity to flexibly adapt, respond, change and ‘move things around’ within her own self.  My mother’s moving was a pattern of dissociating from one ‘place’ to another ‘place’ – externally with an internal echo.

From my point of view, my mother’s life story is probably one of the most profound examples of how an early-forming unsafe and insecure attachment disorder can rob a human being of the ability to EVER feel truly safe or secure.  My mother completely lacked the healthy sense of ‘being at home within’ in a safe and secure way.  As a consequence, the theme of her trauma drama that WAS her life demanded of her that she constantly, constantly, constantly QUEST for her ‘safe and secure home in heaven’ outside of herself.

My mother followed this pattern – alone once her husband divorced her and her children were out of her life – until her lonely dying day in that last pathetic, shabby, run-down, ugly Anchorage, Alaska motel room.

I personally know, even if I do not say a single other word about my mother’s severe ‘mental illness’ within the text of the main body of her own writings, that the title I am assigning to ‘her book’ contains the truth about HOW my mother was in the world because she lacked the capacity to truly be a WHO.  That title describes her Mercurial madness as she blindly followed an invisible Hermes  from place to place to place.

No matter what people might think as they read my mother’s writings, even without my saying one single word to alert readers to the TRUTH about what living with my mother was actually like, my mother’s life was a terrible, terrible tragedy.  From my point of view, my mother didn’t DIE in her infancy and childhood.  She was never actually even born.

And for all the thousands and thousands of words contained in her writings, not one of them names the infant-child abuse, neglect and maltreatment that stole her life away from her as it turned her into a roaring, violent, TERRORIST CAPTOR of a mother.

This is the reason I have chosen the word ‘tale’ rather than ‘story’ for her title.  What is NOT in my mother’s words, or perhaps what barely glimmers a few times here and there, is the true story of her life:  There was early damage done to my mother that meant she never reached any healing no matter how unconsciously and desperately she chased after it.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This post follows the previous three from earlier today:

(1)  +OWNING THE BURDENS CREATED BY CHILD ABUSE

(2) +TRAUMA AND ABUSE SURVIVORS: TROUBLE WHEN WE ARE ALONE WITH OUR PATIENCE TOO LONG

(3)  +TRAUMA WILL NOT SHUT UP UNTIL SOMEBODY LISTENS (TRAUMA DRAMAS SHOUT MOST LOUDLY)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++