+SOFT-EYED PEOPLE IN THIS HARD-EYED CULTURE

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I refuse to be faced with what feels like a problem without at the same time searching for a solution.  I need this balance, and after writing my previous two posts – and as I work on my book – I am greatly in need of some new and deeper understandings.

I was blessed about seven years ago with having a very special horse woman show up temporarily in my life.  She is long gone from this area and I doubt I will ever encounter her again in this lifetime.  Yet today her words came to me clearly, “We must not be afraid to look at the world with SOFT EYES, like horses do.”

In remembering her words this morning I searched online and was gifted immediately with the perfect source of the information I am looking for.  I highly recommend readers take a look here:

The website is titled ‘Shift – Journal of Alternatives:  Neurodiversity and social change’

The article that concerns me is titled, ‘Horse-Assisted Therapy and Eye Contact ’, written by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg.  This article first appeared at ‘Journeys with Autism’.  Cohen-Rottenberg has also published a book titled, ‘The Uncharted Path:  My Journey with Late-Diagnosed Autism’.  She also published in 2011, ‘

Blazing My Trail: Living and Thriving with Autism ‘.

In the article — Horse-Assisted Therapy and Eye Contact — about her experiences in equine therapy Cohen-Rottenberg writes:

A few weeks back, I had an interesting conversation with my instructors, Victoria and Frank, about how to make eye contact with horses.  Victoria began by telling me that predators tend to have eyes in the front of their faces and that they stare at their prey in a very focused way.  Prey animals, however, tend to have eyes on the sides of their faces, allowing for a great deal of peripheral vision that increases their safety.  She encouraged me to try and look at the world like a horse by relaxing my focus and having “soft eyes” that could take in all the information in my peripheral vision.  She then told me that I have to use soft eyes when looking at a horse, because if you make very focused eye contact with a horse, the horse will think you’re a predator, break eye contact, and try to get away from you.  I had already noticed that making direct eye contact with a horse made the horse very uncomfortable, but I hadn’t understood why.”  Read entire article by clicking on its title/link

NOTE:  I am so SOFT EYED and correspondingly SOFT HEARTED right now when I looked at the horse’s eye posted with the above article I cried.  My tears are not veiled from me right now…..  By the way, survivors of early severe infant-child abuse ARE a neurodiverse group of people due to the changes traumatic stress caused in our physiological body-brain development!

++

Humans are by nature and by design both predator and prey.  Those of us whose body-brain was forced to change in development due to extreme traumatic stress exposure during our earliest months and years of life are too familiar with being prey.

The interactions between an abusive mother and her infant do not allow the process to unfold correctly as our right emotional-social brain is forming that includes this same pattern described in this article.  When infants are overly stimulated they will look away from the face of their caregiver.  This movement accomplishes two main physiologically necessary objectives:  (1) looking away diminishes incoming stimulation, and (2) during the time the infant is looking away it is not only down-regulating stimulation to prevent being overwhelmed, it is also processing and integrating the information it has just received into its rapidly developing right brain.

As I have stated numerous times before on this blog, adults do exactly the same thing with a ‘double twist’.  When an adult breaks eye contact with someone in conversation and turns their head to the RIGHT, they are attempting to downplay stimulation at the same time they are accessing the OPPOSITE side of their brain to process the information – LEFT brain being predominately ordered and logical.  If they turn their head to the LEFT they are exercising this same process but are using the RIGHT social-emotional hemisphere of their brain for this purpose.

++

Personally, as I work on this second draft of my book I am choosing to relax what could be or might be a more toughened, hardened, closed, defensive inner way of working that would be more likely to protect me from the emotional experience of my past and of my past as I write it NOW.

I am choosing to write with my SOFT EYES which creates an open, vulnerable, sensitive and risky position of exposure to an entirely different – and deeper – level of my truth.  Because I am working to write an honest book based on my own truth and integrity, I have to write with these SOFT EYES.

I also mention that as I wrote in my previous post, +BLAMING MYSELF THAT I AM NOT ‘ALL BETTER NOW’, I can clearly see children’s SOFT EYES with my own SOFT EYES.  I call this innocence in children that I believe is rarely seen in adult eyes in our culture, as Cohen-Rottenberg mentions in her article about the ‘nature’ of our HARD EYED culture.

I need to give myself permission to be MY OWN SELF, and this self I am right now is a SOFT EYED person.  I was my abusive mother’s PREY for the first 18 years of my life – and she was one helluva predator.  But the other side to this picture is that I am in my soul essence a SOFT EYED, sensitive, creative, gentle person.  I suppose by nature I was at double risk as Mother’s prey.  But I am not about to change who I am, although I often wish I had the flexible adativeness to have HARD EYES when I need them ‘out in the world’.

If I had the money I would love to participate in equine therapy.  I NEED IT!  Maybe someday… In the meantime it is helpful for me to understand that I live in a culture that is not matched to my personality or gifts, and that I would experience conflicts related to this mismatch even if I had not been so abused.  Without the abuse, however, I would not have to deal with the very difficult-to-deal-with consequences in my body that complicate every single thing I feel, know and do in this lifetime.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+RESEARCH: EPIDEMIC OF AUTISM AMONG YOUNG

++++++++++++++++

Is it abuse to pollute the growing and developing body-brain of our young?  This article on childhood autism increases came into my email box through a group I belong to — looks to me like one of the ‘classic’ windows for epigentic forces to alter genetic expression which may then possibly move forward through the generations affecting not only current offspring, but bringing the genetic responses and changes forward into the future.

What do we consider ‘acceptable risks’ and ‘acceptable losses’?  Take a look:

++++

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-barrie-nd/child-autism-epidemic-fir_b_696179.html

Child Autism Epidemic Firmly Linked to Environment

Stephen Barrie, ND

Author, medical researcher, entrepreneur

Autism among U.S. children has reached epidemic proportion. And it’s getting worse by the year.

Since the ’70’s, there has been a 60-fold increase in American children with autism. Currently one in every 100 U.S. children and one in every 58 boys are being diagnosed with autism. That’s over 2.6 percent of all male children in America. The number of autistic children expected to reach adulthood in the next 10 years along with their caregivers will exceed the population of Rhode Island and cost an estimated $27 billion in additional care beyond the almost $60 billion being spent on current autism-related costs. (1,2)

Under the specter of an autism epidemic sweeping America, Senator Barbara Boxer (CA) convened hearings last week on the “State of Research on Potential Environmental Health Factors with Autism.” (3)

The result?

Experts agree that the primary explanation for the dramatic increase in autism is toxic environmental exposure and gene-environment interactions. New research shows that even low-dose, multiple toxic and infectious exposures may be a key factor to the onset of autism.

One expert, Dr. Linda Birnbaum, Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health, testified that “Research supported by NIEH has clearly shown that it is not just genetics that causes neuro-developmental disorders such as autism but rather the interplay of both genes and the environment”.

Dr. Birnbaum also stated that NIEH has uncovered information on the role that early environmental exposures play in the development of a broad spectrum of childhood disorders, including not only autism but also ADHD, and other learning disorders.

Another expert, Dr. Paul Anastas, the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s assistant administrator, told the subcommittee that children are especially susceptible to the effects of chemicals in the environment because they eat, drink and breathe in more for their body weight than adults. They absorb a greater proportion of many chemicals in the environment than adults, and due to hand to mouth behaviors, young children tend to have higher exposures to contaminants, such as pollutants in the surrounding air and dust, deposited from lead paint, tobacco smoke, cleaning products, pesticides and other chemicals. (4,5)

We already know that prenatal and early childhood exposures to chemicals such as methyl mercury (commonly found in fish and some vaccines), lead (in paints), PCBs (in plastics such as baby bottles and food storage containers) and arsenic (in the air) can affect development of the nervous system and lead to developmental disability. (6,7,8)

Also, the developing brain and nervous system can be disrupted by much lower levels of environmental exposures than would affect adults. (9,10,11) You can read about the current levels of exposure in the just released CDC’s National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, a frightening document.

Dr. Isaac Pessah, Director of the UC Davis Center for Children’s Environmental Health, testified that many of the molecular and cellular systems associated with autism are the same ones that are the target of environmental chemicals currently of concern to human health because of their widespread use. He spoke of a critical need to identify which chemicals in the environment influence the same biological pathways that are effected in autism. Dr. Pessah said that limiting exposure to these chemicals is the only way to mitigate or prevent autism in susceptible individuals.

Increasingly, evidence links even chronic, low-level exposure to industrial pollutants to many of the most prevalent and disabling learning and behavioral problems in children.

Professor Bruce Lanphear Ph.D, of the Child & Family Research Institute, Simon Fraser University, reported that some of the most widely dispersed environmental toxicants, even at very low levels are risk factors for the “new morbidities” of childhood — both intellectual and behavioral impairments such as autism. Indeed, there is often no apparent threshold — in some cases the effects appear to be greater at the lowest levels of exposure. (12) Emerging evidence shows that a whole host of new environmental chemicals such as Bisphenol A, (the protective inner lining in tin cans and baby bottles) PBDEs, pesticides, phthalates and airborne pollutants are all associated with intellectual deficits or behavioral problems in children. (13,14,15)

Just prior to the Senate hearing, several important research papers were published that further documented the relationship between environmental toxins and autism:

• A study in India correlated the increased body burdens of lead and mercury with the severity of children’s autism — the more severe the autism, the higher concentrations of heavy metals were found in their bodies. (16)
• An exhaustive scientific literature search just completed in August shows that the link between autism and toxic exposures in infants is supported by current published research. (17)

My own recent study of a large autistic clinical database shows that children with autism had elevated levels in their bodies of several chemicals known to be neurotoxic. The children have genetic variations, which interfere with the proper detoxification of those chemicals. With over 2,000 patients in the database, my paper is one of the largest studies to show that environmental factors interacting with associated genetic components may be contributing to the causation of autism.

Development of the human nervous system begins in the womb and extends throughout childhood. During these periods of rapid development, the brain is vulnerable to some environmental exposures, which may have the potential to disrupt the chemical signals that organize development. Even small changes can have potentially major consequences for brain structure and function. Thus, even brief adverse exposure at these vulnerable stages can have lasting effects on brain function throughout life.

My report showed on average the amount of lead and mercury in the children’s blood was 50 percent higher than normal. Their genetic changes (SNPs) were related to what is called Phase I and Phase II detoxification — specifically the CYP and GST family of genes. This defect reduced the children’s ability to remove excess toxins from their bodies.

These autistic children also had a several fold higher level of bad gut bacteria and reduced levels of beneficial gut bacteria. Bad gut bacteria can produce neurotoxic amines and cause a “leaky gut” which allows toxic substances to more easily enter the circulatory system (see my previous Huffington Post entry “The Keys to Maintaining a Healthy Gut“).

You may read the full clinical study here:http://personalizedmedicine.posterous.com/environmental-factors-contributing-to-the-ons#

We as a society have a toxic chemical addiction, which we need to kick now. We need to be better informed consumers — choosing chemically free foods, products and environments, affecting change with our wallets.

Here are some Toxic Exposure Avoidance Tips for All of Us — And Especially For Pregnant Women. Start taking them, right now:

  1. Avoid eating foods that may contain high levels of toxic chemicals
  2. While fish are a good source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, some contain high levels of mercury. Tuna, Cod and Mahi Mahi are ones to avoid. Wild salmon is a good healthy choice.
  3. Consume organic foods and drinks as much as possible.
  4. Use glass containers instead of plastic to store left over foods and drinks.
  5. Reduce our purchase of foods in cans as the can lining contains high levels of Bisphenol A (an endocrine disrupter linked to increased rates of cancer and abnormal behavior in children).
  6. Limit exposure to toxic household chemicals, pesticides and cleaning supplies. Look for natural alternatives.
  7. Install HEPA and carbon filter air purifiers in bedrooms to insure a healthy toxin free nights rest.

Exposure to toxic chemicals by pregnant women, fetuses and children has a high probability of causing autism and other neuro-developmental disorders and learning disabilities in those whose genetic profile expresses in a reduced ability to detoxify these chemicals. This is not “fringe” science; it’s fact.

The time for action is now. We must reduce our exposure to toxic chemicals for ourselves, for our children’s sake and for future generations.

We have a responsibility to protect those who cannot protect themselves. We cannot afford to be incurious, indifferent or uninformed when the price of inattention is disability and heartache — an overwhelming emotional and financial burden to families and society.

Ask for help: Tell your government that we must lessen our exposure to these chemicals. For the future of all Americans. Email or call your own representatives. Senator Boxer can be reached at: senator@boxer.senate.gov.
References

(1) Autism Society of America (ASA). 2003. Facts and statistics. Available: http://www.autism-society.org/

(2) Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfate. 2005 PA Autism Census Project: Final Report; Oct 2009

(3) US Senate Subcommittee on Environment and Public Works. Aug 2010

(4) National Research Council. 1993. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC.

(5) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005 Guidance on selecting age groups for monitoring and assessing childhood exposures to environmental contaminants. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC; EPA/630/P-03/003F

(6) Wasserman GA, Liu X, Parvez F, Ahsan H, Factor-Litvak P, Kline J, van Geen A, Slavkovich V, Loiacono NJ, Levy D, Cheng Z, Graziano JH. 2007. Water arsenic exposure and intellectual function in 6-year-old children in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect. 115(2):285-9

(7) Landrigan PJ, Whitworth RH, Baloh RW, Barthel WF, Staehling NW, Rosenblum BF. 1975. Neuropsychological dysfunction in children with chronic low-level lead absorption. Lancet 1:708-712

(8) Rogan WJ, Ware JH. 2003. Exposure to lead in children – how low is low enough? N Engl J Med. 348:1515-1516

(9)(ATSDR). 2007. Toxicological profile for Lead. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp13-c3.pdf

(10) Grandjean P, and Landrigan PJ. 2006. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet.;368(9553):2167-78.

(11) Jett DA, Kuhlmann AC, Farmer SJ, Guilarte TR.1997. Age-dependent effects of developmental lead exposure on performance in the Morris water maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav.57(1-2):271-9

(12) Canfield RL, Henderson CR, Cory-Slechta DA, Cox C, Jusko TA, Lanphear BP. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 micrograms per deciliter. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1517-1526

(13) Eskenazi B, Marks AR, Bradman A, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodevelopment in young Mexican-American children. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:792-798

(14) Herbstman JB, Sjödin A, Kurzon M, et al. Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neuro-development. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:712-719

(15) Braun JM, Froehlich TE, Daniels JL, et al. Association of environmental toxicants and conduct disorder in U.S. children: NHANES 2001-2004. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:956-962

(16) Priya MD. Level of Trace Elements (Copper, Zinc, Magnesium
and Selenium) and Toxic Elements (Lead and Mercury)
in the Hair and Nail of Children with Autism. Biol Trace Elem Res
DOI 10.1007/s12011-010-8766-2

(17) DeSoto MC. Sorting out the spinning of autism: heavy metals and the
question of incidence. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2010, 70: 165-176

++++++++++++++++