+++++++++++++++++++++++
I rewatched the movie “Antwone Fisher” yesterday. This movie is about an adult working to heal from terrible child abuse inspired by a true story and marks Denzel Washington’s directorial debut.
From my point of view, what the movie never describes is what probably makes the biggest difference in the outcome of this story. What were Antwone’s first foster parents like? Did they love that parentless infant RIGHT? Did they form a safe and secure attachment with the baby?
According to the story Antwone was removed at age two from his first foster home he had been placed in when he was two months old. For all concerns about interfering with early bonding-attachment relationships, I do not believe that age two is a permanently damaging age to change primary early attachments. In this case the child was moved to a horribly abusive home, but nothing in the story addresses the nature and the quality of the earliest, most critically important caregiver attachment patterns BEFORE the age of two that impact the direction that all fundamental physiological development follows. (See update in comment section to this post.)
I would say by looking at the story as it is presented in this movie that Antwone’s first two years HAD to have taken place within an adequately non-malevolent caregiver-attachment environment. The remarkable recovery that occurs post-terrible LATER abuse would NOT have followed the same course it did if Antwone’s physiological body-brain development had been changed by severe trauma during his infancy.
When looking at our own recovery from our own severe child abuse it remains MOST IMPORTANT that we understand how profoundly our physiological development is impacted by our earliest experiences in our environment. If we continually struggle to overcome the horrors of severe abuse experiences that we KNOW about, and can never manage to ‘get our wings’ and soar out of the ugly mire of abuse we know we experienced, I would ALWAYS say that it’s most likely that our body-brain development was changed by trauma in profound ways during the earliest months of our life.
I personally know that if the first two years of my life had been perfectly FINE I would not be in the same body NOW that I am in – no matter how severely I had been abused post-two-years-old. It is the Trauma Altered Development that happened to me before that age because I was BORN into a malevolent, abusive and traumatic malevolent environment that has created these lifelong difficulties that I (along with all infant-toddler severe trauma-abuse survivors) continue to struggle with.
Because the presentation of Antwone’s story in this film completely ignores those first two MOST CRITICAL years of the child’s life we are left guessing that all infant-child abuse survivors could recover by following a pathway such as this survivor did. Not so. Not so. Not so!
It is not ‘getting lucky enough’ to benefit from high quality therapy that makes the biggest difference. It is not ‘being willing enough’ to face our traumatic childhood memories of experience that makes the biggest difference, either. It is not ‘being genetically superior’ or even ‘being resilient enough’ that matters most.
As Dr. Bruce Perry clearly states, children are not born resilient. They are born MALLEABLE. When the earliest environment deprives a rapidly growing and developing infant-toddler of what it needs for its body-brain to follow an optimal pathway, Trauma Altered Development will occur – BECAUSE of this malleability. The resilience a little person needs in order to develop a body most able to ‘deal with’ severe traumas anytime after the age of two comes in ONE WAY and ONE WAY only – FROM THE PEOPLE WHO CARE FOR THAT BABY from the time it is conceived UNTIL it has ESPECIALLY reached the developmental milestones a body has built into it by two years of age.
As far as I can tell a description of these first critical months of experience are complete missing from the Antwone Fisher story.
Is this same time-frame description missing from your child abuse story? If you continue a struggle to heal from early traumas you DO know about in a body that does not seem to be operating ‘quite right’, my guess is that whatever description of your first months of life that you GUESS happened to you needs to be closely examined in the bright light of reality.
None of us just happened to end up in a Trauma Altered Development body through bad luck. We were built this way because we grew from (conception) birth in a caregiving environment that did NOT do exactly that: Give us the care we needed prior to age two so that we could have a body healthy and resilient enough to fully process and recover from our later abuse.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Not a definitive data source, but this link (http://www.answers.com/topic/antwone-fisher-1) says:
“…At age two he left his first foster home, which had been a loving one, and was placed in…”
Great – that’s all we need to KNOW!