+WORDLESS PLACES (Dark Side book 2, Chapter 16)

The Dark Side of Mildred’s Mountain series – Angel book 2 beginning with the POP!  Goes Alaska letters – chapter 16

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

16.  Wordless places

March 29, 2013.  Twenty years ago when I was visiting my older brother John in Ashland, Oregon I told him I would not have wanted a single thing to have been different in my childhood if any change would have meant that I would not have been able to live in Alaska and on our mountain homestead.  My brother told me that if I really believed that I was nuts.  It has taken me this long to finally know what John meant. 

I needed that land because of the way my childhood was.  I needed that land to save me.  Had I not suffered the abuse that I did I would have been spared the need for being saved and therefore spared also of my deep need for that land.  Book closed.  End of story.

I have no belief that had we not moved to Alaska, had we not homesteaded, had we stayed in California or had we moved anywhere else that the horrors present in my childhood would have been removed.  At this point in my life I understand that the lifelong physiological changes to my body caused by severe exposure to chronic traumatic stress would have happened to me anyway.  If fact, most of the problematic changes happened in California to me before the age of two, and certainly by my age of being nearly six when the Alaska move took place.

Although I have reversed my declaration as I would state it to John now, nothing changes the past.  My speculations are fruitless unless they provide me with insight into my life in ways that are useful to me today.  As it stands I cannot imagine being alive now had Alaska not provided me with what I needed to counteract all the negative forces present in my childhood so that I could survive it.

°<>°

What does child abuse do to people?

After I completed my BA in psychology in 1983 I took a graduate course in counseling.  I worked as hard as I could in that class but received my first disappointing “C.”  Most of our grade came from pairing off to practice empathy and “active listening” techniques.  I followed the steps carefully but obviously they made no sense to me.  Thirty years later I know why I could not do what my professor required.  I do not understand the most important communication signals between people.

Nothing that happened to me during the first 18 years of my life was designed to build into me the ability to process human social-emotional information in ordinary (as I use the word) ways.  Because I was a very smart child I got by because I learned how to fill in the blank spots created by a nearly complete lack of caring, genuine, compassionate and empathetic interactions by other people with me.  In other words, although I had no way to know it I learned how to pretend to be someone resembling an “ordinary” person.

I have always known what all the superficial indicators of expression and intent mean on a surface level.  Yet my ability to engage in social exchange with other people cannot be considered effective by ordinary standards of communication except in the simplest, most trivial and trite ways.  With a few very rare exceptions what I give in conversation is not what other people expect, want or evidently need and what they can give to me is not what I want or need, either.  Genuine, authentic conversation based on mutual exchange of integrity is therefore mostly missing from my life.

Part of what I seem to be missing is an ability that appears innate in ordinary conversation.  The capacity to filter what is not from what is considered appropriate to know about a person and then to form a return response that includes reference only to this acceptable information is not, however, an inborn skill.  It is one that is formed into a very young infant-child’s developing physiology very early in life through safe and secure patterns of communication between little people and their attachment caregivers. 

Over time the foundational aspects of communication provide the inner ability to interact appropriately in increasingly complex emotional-social situations with members of one’s species.  I was not given the opportunities required to form this kind of interactional foundation.  What I needed later on to build upon my missing foundation was not available to me, either.

These shortcomings in my early experience as they were compounded by deprivations in the quality of interactions I had with others all the way through my childhood, coupled with my exposure to horrific long-term chronic traumatic abuse, combined with lengthy periods of isolation left me nearly “synch-less” when it comes to participating in successful, mutually satisfying communication with others.  While my counseling professor evidently noticed this condition in me with a critical assessment to the negative, he certainly did not offer any kind of helpful interchange with me that could have assisted me to learn thirty years ago what I have finally come to understand about myself on my own.

°<>°

Bump and chop in conversations

It seems to me from my perspective that people who were raised in the absence of debilitating deprivation and trauma naturally incorporate patterns of ordinary existence into their life so that ordinary is natural and comfortable to them.  Ordinary would of course then be a completely valuable inclusion in their discourse with others who also completely know from the inside out what ordinary is.  Yet even if this is true people are people and life is life and nobody escapes difficulties.

Part of my troubles with being in contact with other people is that I was formed to know things in extraordinary ways.  Most of the time the information I detect from others is private to them and is not what they intend for me to know about them.  Because I do not have ordinary filters I almost always inevitably experience a very awkward and uncomfortable pattern created for me (and often for the other person) as I try to slow down my responses enough to use a conscious filter that will let me include what I suspect I am supposed to include and exclude what I imagine I am supposed to exclude from my responses to others.

Given that humans are designed to gather information from tiny facial muscular changes in others at the speed of minimally twenty signals per second, and given that the ability to process this emotional-social information accurately and appropriately (or not) is built into the rapid-forming right limbic brain hemisphere during the first year of life, inadequate infant-mother (caregiver) interactions inevitably harm the physiologically developing ability in the brain to carry on future interactions between self and others in ordinary ways.  People expect to be attended to, heard and responded to FAST.  Because most people in mainstream American culture are geared to keep ordinary visible and difficulty invisible to other people (Mildred’s mental illness amplified this split), those of us who have been formed in environments of trauma are always at a disadvantage in the race of ordinary conversation (whether we know this or not).

My difficulty is not that I do not accurately read (watch) people.  My difficulty is that I read them too well.  I can detect the truth of their reality – as they are ACTUALLY expressing themselves without words – so fast and gather so much information that without the proper emotional-social filter that ordinary people have I am forever out-of-step with social expectations and tolerances when it comes to communication.  What I end up with is an assessment that nearly all social exchanges appear to be a sloppy, inarticulate, inaccurate, phony unsatisfying mess while my contributions can never be upgraded to anything over a “C.”

°<>°

Without words

I could call my native language “traumaspeak.”  This is the language I began to learn even before I knew what a word was.  I learned this language through a long childhood of having to hone (automatic) super-vigilant abilities to detect what was really going on within my home environment where nothing was ever what it seemed to be until Mother EXPLODED and then the truth of my world became obvious.  I was raised without safety and therefore formed no ability to trust humans – period.  Because I was a human in a human world my existence was extremely complex.

In an environment where rage is always present (somewhere) waiting to loom and take over the experience of a child some degree of physiological alertness has to always be present.  My world had always been this way from the time I was born.  I naturally developed alternatively to endure within this alternative environment.  (Now I understand that not only was this world not ordinary, it was psychotic.)

No human being, certainly not a small one, can survive being in a chronic state of reaction to danger and threat to life without being able to live through some periods of rest, some periods of quasi-restful calm without being directly aware of the presence of danger and threat.  The spans of time I was able to snatch for myself to be a child existed because my body itself “dissociated” my awareness of my chronic trauma state.  My body-brain manufactured a way for me to live a “second life” along with the chronic trauma state in between Mother’s direct psychotic attacks.

So distant from one another and so entirely separated were these two lives I lived that when I was in my own-self child life I was never prepared for one of Mother’s attacks.  I was never ready.  I never anticipated or expected any one of them.  I felt as shocked at each attack as if it was the first one happening to me for the first time.

Every attack took me by surprise.  I was completely startled every single time.  I was incredulous when fairly late in my adulthood I realized how strange this was.  It has taken me a long time to understand what caused me to be so oblivious to the ongoing presence of the threat of harm during my childhood.  That repeated feeling of shocked surprise was one of my strongest memories, and for a long time I criticized myself for “being so stupid” that I should have had that reaction.

Every time was the first time?  Every time I stared at her lunging toward me with wide-eyed profoundly stunned amazement?  Every time I was completely taken by surprise?  I never had an instant’s pause to have the conscious thought, “Oh, NO!  Here she comes again!”  I NEVER saw an attack coming.  Not one single time.

Mother was psychotic!  How could I have known when she was going to switch into one of her psychotic states of insane rage?  How could I have survived if I had no way to turn off the flow of chronic panic, confusion and terror if my body had not taken over complete control of how I experienced myself in my life?  In my two LIVES?

These separated islands of perceived calm were broken into very small individual pieces as inevitable trauma after trauma repeatedly interrupted my experience of being my own self-child living my life in between attacks.  I had no bridge of language between the two worlds I lived in.  I had no way to think about the trauma in any way. 

I therefore had an equal inability to conceptualize, understand, prepare for, anticipate or defend myself against the harm that happened to me.  The pure act of enduring happens without words.  I was therefore continually jerked back and forth from one life I lived that had words and the other one I lived through that had no words.  (I am not talking here about Mother’s horrible verbal abuse.  That is an entirely different subject from my OWN missing words.)

Nobody ever talked to me about the wordless world.  I never talked to anyone about the wordless world.  I could not talk to myself about the wordless world.  At every instant I was forced to crash out of my own life into Mother’s brutal psychotic one all words disappeared.  There was no way I could ever be prepared for that switch to happen except as my body automatically took care of me – without words.  The inexplicable had no words.

I was left without words for as long as it took for me to be able to return to my own (other) life.  I was not able to begin to discover there were words for the wordless world until I experienced my first counseling when I was 29 years old.  Without words I had no context.  I had no frame of reference.  I had no way to even begin to know I had ever been abused at all, not even when it was happening to me.

I went a long, long, long time not in denial but in a void of wordless oblivion regarding the essence of what difficulties I had lived through.  Perhaps what I see so often in other people I meet is their own wordless oblivion.  Perhaps there is much in people’s lives that they do not speak of because they have never had the words to do so.  Perhaps it is a lack of words that creates that imperceptible but very present communication filter within and then between people in the first place.

°<>°

Lack of comprehension

I had an 18-year experience of being ultimately alone which included vast areas within me that I could not know.  There was no bridge of lasting stature ever formed between me and another human being.  I was able to discover bridges elsewhere between myself and factors of the world I lived in because I was surrounded by the place of Alaska which on its own defines no separation between itself and anything or anyone else.

Of course if I had disappeared into the wilderness my lifespan would have been greatly shortened.  I had a place called a home within a family that did keep my body alive.  But past that point there was very little given to me from which I could build myself into a person capable of negotiating life with others of my species in any helpful or meaningful way.

While I understand that humans are not pieces of debris tumbling down a massive river through time, birth to death, I now understand that in this lifetime I will never be able to comprehend who they are or what they are actually doing from their point of view any more than I can comprehend an ant, a leaf or a bird.  I tried to learn as a child.  I can see in Mother’s letters where, when and how she was able to – and did – reach out her long arms of abuse to remove from me opportunities I had outside of our home to try to learn at warp speed what other children are able to learn gradually over the span of their entire childhood.  (This included her removing me from my grandmother.)

Mother could not and hence did not remove all opportunities from me.  I naturally made the greatest possible use of every available chance I had to make progress in my development in any way that I could.  I remained alive and grew up to be the best person I know how to be.

I was, however, made to be a watcher of life which includes being a watcher of people.  I watch humans in the same way I watched the focused and determined activity of ants that spent their lifetime occupied within the universe of their rotting logs on the mountainside, in the same way I watch leaves bud and open on a rose bush and birds gather dry grass and bits of string to build a nest.

There is no pressure of expectation, suggestion or demand that I act like an ant or a budding leaf or a bird.  At 61 I am tired of trying to belong in the world of people.  And I mean tired as in tired out.  Tired of.  Worn down.  Worn out.  Exhausted. 

I know myself now much better than I did thirty years ago when I tried so hard in that class to do what I could not do while I didn’t know I had no ability to do it.  I cannot accurately mirror other people’s reality back to them in a way that they will accept or understand because I have no way to ever cross any bridge of comprehension that would let me know in the least what any experience of being an ordinary human feels like.

As I write these words I realize that there will be some readers of my words who will know exactly what I am talking about.  Not one of these readers will have come out of a safe and secure childhood.  Not one was born loved.  Not one was given what they needed as they grew up to know on a feeling level what trust in humanity could possibly be.  These people probably share with me this inescapably, inexhaustibly lonely way to live.

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

Please click here to read or to Leave a Comment »

++++

+WRAITH CHILD (Dark Side book 2, Chapter 14)

The Dark Side of Mildred’s Mountain series – Angel book 2 beginning with the POP!  Goes Alaska letters – chapter 14

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

14.  Wraith child

Here is the last part of Mildred’s Tuesday, August 6, 1957 letter (from chapter 11) as I believe she wrote it after psychotically erupting at me for something SHE saw happen that never did.  Mildred introduced at the end of her letter the people who bought and moved into the log house in front of ours sometime during the first five days we were in Alaska.  Again, she does not initially give their names, which were Janie and Scotty. 

I’ve only said “Hello” and exchanged a few brief words with my front neighbor.  She’s very attractive, slim, and smart looking.  They have a beautiful place too!!  The people that moved out told me these new people, especially the man, don’t like people and want to be left alone!  They bought the place thinking the Spoerrys [our log house landlady and her husband living in Algeria] would live here in this house who had no children and both were working SO I’ve kept my distance – until they get to know us.  (I understand how they feel too.)  (They have a 3 year old girl and a 10 month baby boy.)

No other news – school starts the day after Labor Day, at least two weeks earlier than California so it really won’t be long now.

We’re all fine, happy and healthy.  I wake up every morning excited anew over Alaska.  We love it but we were ready for it here.  There are undoubtedly people that don’t like it – I’ll send you a clipping from paper from one that didn’t.

Will close now.  Much love, Mildred, Bill and the children.

°<>°

Borderline Personality Disorder people are known to radically, and usually inexplicably to others, flip sides in relationships as they typically first idealize and then vilify them.  In spite of all the rambling descriptions Mildred wrote about these people during the year we lived in the log house as their neighbor, what she says about them a year after she moved out of the log house in her July 28, 1959 letter written to her mother is significant to me:

I stopped to see Janie yesterday for the first time since the snow melted.  Her furniture is arranged just the same.  She is just the same.  Oh, some people!!

I hear Mother’s voice of condemnation in these words.  Shame on boring stupid inferior Janie!  In my recent conversation with her Joe Anne Vanover told me that “Mildred had a great need to be superior to everyone else.”  It did not matter what the subject was, Mother was the only person who was ALWAYS right. 

In the year that passed from the time my parents moved us out of the log house at the end of their year’s lease July 31, 1958 (while, as Mildred states, Janie didn’t move or move her furniture) Mildred moved us next into a primitive rented cabin so she could “practice homesteading.” When that living soon became difficult she moved us into an apartment in Anchorage, then into a small trailer parked in Pollard’s field at the bottom of the mountain, then up to the homestead to live in a canvas Jamesway hut, and THEN back to the log house by the fall of 1959, a move she had in motion when she made the above comment about Janie.

As it turned out in the real world, shortly after Mildred made her scathing observation about Janie, she and her family did move out of their log home they had been living in for two years without ever having mentioned a word to Mildred about their plans.  Mother would not have remotely cared, anyway.  In her reality she was the only person who mattered.  This is all in illustration of how Mother obliviously lived in an inarticulated crucible where meanings were defined by her sick mind within which we were all forced to reside with her.   Her judgments against other people never alerted her to the benefits of normalcy or to the harm of her madness. 

I had no experiences that could have given me any perspective other than Mother’s.  As I make this note I think about the emptiness of my young adult mind after I left home at 18.  Because there was nothing ordinary about my life with Mother there was damage done to my development in many ways due to her inability to keep chaos out of her life.  As I mentioned in the previous chapter by the time I left home I was significantly lacking in three areas related to my inability to conceptualize (a) the passage of time, (b) the constancy of objects in space over the passage of time, and (c) a sense of self.  Under ordinary conditions I would have certainly integrated these concepts as they are basic to ordinary mainstream American life.

°<>°

The hammock and the passage of time

I mark a significant memory of mine as having been formed through an experience I had in early April of 1971 when I was 19.  I accompanied a man named PJ who was the father of my unborn child and “the love of my life” to visit his friends who lived in Sausalito, California.  Feeling an outsider to these peoples’ conversation I wandered around their rambling yard where I noticed the first hammock I had ever seen stretched between the trunks of two shade trees at the edge of a garden.  It looked new and was made of white cotton cord.  I stopped to study the hammock without having any desire to climb into it.

Over the course of the next months the turbulence and chaos of my life continued to carry me through currents of great changes.  By early October of this same year (after my 20th birthday) I again traveled with PJ to his friends’ house.  Again I felt myself an outsider to their conversation and again I wandered their garden with my baby girl in my arms. 

This time when I passed the two trees the hammock was no longer whole.  I stood in amazement in front of grayed and broken shreds of rope, most of which trailed down to the ground to become entangled in yellow brittle weeds and grasses.  This was the first time in my life I became personally aware of the reality of the passage of time.  It was as if I experienced a paradigm shift that altered how I viewed life as a whole and how I felt about myself in relationship to it.

My life with Mildred gave me no sense of constancy.  I had never known anything but ongoing, perpetual and usually traumatic change that had no obvious cause and that followed no reasonable course over time.  It was not until the instant I was visually confronted by the changes that had happened to that hammock in between the times I had seen it new and whole and the next time I had seen its dismantling that I recognized that change itself occurs within the passing of a specific amount (length, period) of time.  This was the first time I understood that all change is not random.

I had been through many, many serious and difficult experiences during the months it had taken that hammock to disintegrate.  My life, run as it had always been upon accident and instinct, had never been accounted for directly within time itself until that moment.  The hammock, along with the changes that had happened to it (through exposure over six months of time to rain, sea salts in the air, wind, sunshine), brought my first conscious awakening to the momentous idea that there are some kind of mysterious consequences inherent in time passing over-through-by-around a stable object that remained constant in place so that its nature is drastically changed simply because the object exists – in time. 

At this juncture in the development of my mind I was able to finally include myself in this equation that time and change were connected to one another and that I, as an “agent” could witness how time changes things.  This is how I gained, at age 19, my first inkling of awareness that I existed as a separate and distinct self-person-body in that world of time passing and change.  After all, it was I that had also traveled through time and change to be able to capture both of those two distinct images in my mind of the perfect whole hammock and of the one that the passage of time had destroyed.

My insight, although subtle and outside the range of my thoughts, changed me in ways not unlike how the sound of an orchestra would change if an important new instrument was added into it.  Before my experience with the hammock change and the passing of time were disconnected (dissociated) from any sense I had of myself in ongoing life.  Yet even now dissociation, built into my body from my infancy through Mother’s psychotic treatment of me, remains a complicating factor in that I doubt I remember my life experiences in ordinary ways.

°<>°

A culture of one

Even as I write these words I am stretching my story of myself in my life from who and how I am now at age 61 as I write this book back through key signature moments in my young adult life as I consider how certain awakenings then were connected not only to who and how I was right before my sixth birthday in August 1957 but also reaching all the way back to being born to my psychotic mentally ill mother in the first place.  Because she had never passed through her own earliest self-development processes correctly, and because all of her difficulties deprived her of the ability to recognize me as an individual person separate from her, I was deprived of the ability to recognize my own self as a person (who existed in time) separate from Mother.

This level of damage is very difficult to articulate and describe.  Normal children with safe and secure adequate early attachment relationships with their primary caregivers have in place by the time they are one year old all the critical self-recognition information they need to continue developing that self.  Whatever experiences a growing child needs to have to be able to (seemingly) naturally and automatically gain both awareness that they are a self and then that they are a self-agent did not happen for me as the captive of the hell-half of Mother’s sick split mind. 

As author Edmund Carpenter described in his 1973 book, Eskimo Realities (Holt, Rinehart and Winston) about the Canadian arctic Eskimo culture prior to Anglo Christian contact, the passage of time, degrees of perceived permanence/impermanence of objects and constructs of self are culturally determined.  These conceptions both define their expression in language at the same time they create the underpinnings of language, itself.  I was forced to exist primarily as a member of a unique culture that was made up (created by) by psychotic Mother to be lived by only me. 

I was, therefore, raised isolated within a culture of one.  Even though I had contact with outsiders to my culture which included controlled contact with my siblings, my core experience was defined by Mother.  I could not have meaningful language for experiences I had never had.  The lack of experience and the corresponding dearth of words with which to conceptualize what I did not know led me eventually in my adulthood to the very late discovery of ideas that belonged to cultures other than mine, most significantly to the dominant American culture.  The difficulty for me in reverse is to find a way to communicate to people who are foreign to my “culture of one” what my life has been like.

°<>°

The ashtray and the constancy of objects over time

 After the complexity of many more changes and moves the next moment of significant enlightenment for me came about nine months after my hammock-related recognition.  I had landed in Fargo, North Dakota with my daughter who was now 18 months old.  We lived in a small rented basement apartment.  Lily, our very kind landlady, lived in the other half of the basement.  Lily cared for her ailing older brother who occupied the main floor of the house.

Over the next few months of visiting Lily in her apartment it suddenly flashed into my awareness one day as I sat having coffee in her kitchen that over this period of time Lily’s small ashtray, one of those metal topped ones with a plaid cloth bottom filled with sand, ALWAYS occupied exactly the same spot at the bottom of shelves built into the wall beside the breakfast nook table and benches when it was not in use.  Whenever I wanted to smoke a cigarette it was always to this spot I could look for the ashtray and it was always right there.  This was my moment of awakening to the idea that something could remain the same over the passage of time.

This was the first time, just as I was about to turn 20, that I had experienced any personal antidote to Mother’s judgmental concept having to do with her chaotic sense of the passage of time and the impermanence of objects in time as she expressed it in her 1959 letter speaking of Janie, “Her furniture is arranged just the same.  She is just the same.  Oh, some people!!”  In those 1959 letters Mildred stated within a week after she wrote those words that Janie and her family indeed did move out of their house, although Mildred did not offer any recognition of how they had only been living there for two years before they disappeared.  The only sense of the passage of time that existed in Mildred’s life or mattered to her was her own.

My ashtray insight struck me profoundly because up until that moment I had never comprehended that any kind of stability existed in anyone’s life, let alone that stability could FEEL good and be a good rather than bad experience.  This was the first split-second permanent shift in my thinking that just as this ashtray and all it was connected to in Lily’s life had continuity and stability over time, so also was I and my daughter experiencing stability.  However, this spat of stability only lasted four months for me and I moved again.

°<>°

The wraith and the absence of a continuous self

After the next brief three month move-in and move-out of an apartment on the north side of Fargo I next found myself sharing a small house in Minnesota with a friend and her son on the other side of the Red River by winter 1972.  One still night of falling snow I walked alone to a nearby campus and found myself circumambulating the center plaza’s sidewalks in a pattern that left behind my footprints in the sparkling empty whiteness.  I finally stood at the center of a wide circle with my bare palms lifted to the sky ahead of me as I watched snowflakes disappear into the warmth of my hands.

As I stood mesmerized by snow falling and melting on my palms through the silence four words spurted from some distant source that spoke to me only this:  “I am a wraith.”  Though I heard the words they held no meaning to me at the time.  I had no idea what a wraith was and no recollection that I had ever heard the word before.

I accepted this experience without question in the same way I had everything else I had ever gone through.  By this time at age 21 I wasn’t a lost self.  I wasn’t any self at all.  How does a person who has no sense of self at all become rescued from obscurity? 

Forty years later as I examine this word I know how accurate it was to describe me at my young adult age.  Sadly, even now I cannot say I have made a lot of progress out of the condition I was forced into through exposure to such horrific trauma during the first 18 years of my life.  No matter how I look at how I feel in the world, the following is still a far more accurate description of my reality than any other I have ever found.  I cannot argue with this word.

Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary states that the origin of this word is “unknown”; it’s first known use in Modern English was in 1513; and it’s definition is:  “1a: the exact likeness of a living person seen usually just before death as an apparition b: ghost, specter.  2: an insubstantial form or semblance:  shadow.  3: a barely visible gaseous or vaporous column.” 

The online free dictionary Wiktionary states that “wraith” is a Scottish dialectal word for “ghost, spirit.”  Some claim it has connections to Icelandic vörðr meaning “warden, guardian.”  Others suggest possible Celtic or Norse origins.  Walter W. Skeat conjectured in his 1893 book, An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (2nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon) that “wraith” was of Scandinavian origin meaning “an apparition in the likeness of a person, supposed to be seen soon before, or soon after death.  The apparition called a wraith was supposed to be that of one’s guardian angel.” (p. 720)

(Note:  An online search using these words in combination will reveal technical aspects related to what the word “wraith” more imaginably describes:  child abuse  trauma dissociation depersonalization derealization.)

°<>°

These three experiences I have described were significant to my own quickening knowledge that I had definition and that I was actually “something else” other than a blob of body that had occupied space in time for the purpose of receiving abuse from Mother.  I have continued to suffer from a disconnected sense of myself through time.  There was no possible way my awakening to the consciousness of my own self-existence could have happened instantaneously at 18 when I left home.  I am still involved in this process and will be for the rest of my life.

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

Please click here to read or to Leave a Comment »

++++

 

 

+SPINOFF WRITING NOTES TO DARK SIDE BOOK 2 CHAPTER 11

++++

I just finished chapter 11 of this book.  The chapter is over 5,000 words long and is quite complex for readers who are not familiar with the story being told.  The following are thoughts that sprung into mind as I worked with the material in chapter 11 which includes a psychotic abuse incident that happened to me when I was five years old the first week after our family’s move to Alaska.

The Dark Side of Mildred’s Mountain series – Angel book 2 beginning with the POP!  Goes Alaska letters – chapter 12

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

12.  Spinoff Notes to Chapter 11

Hurts and Harms

I don’t think anyone who has not seen a mentally ill person switch into a rage attack mode can begin to imagine the horror even of what that person’s face looks like let alone what their voice sounds like and what violence they are capable of committing upon very, very young and small children during an active psychotic episode.  It would be tempting to describe it in terms of them being possessed by the darkest demonic forces imaginable.  But this is NOT what happened to Mother.  She suffered from a severe mental illness that was extremely dangerous to her children, most centrally to me.

While there have been times throughout the history of our species and places around the globe where children have been and are being despised, neglected and brutalized, I stand on the side of advancements of civilization that recognize children have rights and deserved to be loved, protected and adequately cared for.  I refuse to diminish my recognition of the harm done to me by Mother’s mentally ill psychotic hatred of me just because “plenty of children suffer.”  Especially in my case the contrast between the “have” children and the “have not” child (me) was so profound that it always astounds me that I had no ability to have thoughts or feelings of any kind related to my predicament until I was nearly 30 years old. 

I had never known anything different and neither had my siblings.  Even though I could not consciously notice, comprehend or articulate anything related to these patterns of Mother’s abusive bias for my siblings and against me, her continual anti-Linda mindset, attitudes, feelings and actions HURT me terribly.  Mother’s direct verbal and physical attacks on me were periodic.  Her mental sickness about me was constant.

While I condemn all physical assaults and all verbal attacks against infants and children, I also realistically differentiate levels of harm according to the degree and kind of mental illness present in an abusive parent (caregiver).  What I describe of my childhood with Mildred did not “just” come from any simple form of favoritism, dislike of my “personality,” jealousy by Mother over anyone else’s positive attention toward me, or simply from “bad parenting.”  Something much rarer and profoundly dangerous was going on.  The kind of harm a mother with Borderline Personality Disorder with an all-good all-bad psychotic split mind does, who singles out one child to be targeted as the devil’s child confined to hell, is beyond comprehension or description.

An image comes into my mind about the way we might think overall about the degrees of harm done to little people by culturally assessed “ordinary” abuse all the way through a continuum to the harm done by “psychotic” abuse.  Popular belief might suggest that the level of harm done by what is considered “ordinary” child abuse can be likened to the experience of standing in a long line at a movie theater’s concession stand only to find once the counter is reached that the desired popcorn has been sold out, while the level of harm done by comprehensive psychotic child abuse could be likened to standing in line to enter a holocaust gas chamber. 

Although I do not write of sexual abuse because it is not a part of my experience, I do include it in what I say next about my response to anyone who asks the question, “How could someone do that to a child?”  If harm to an infant or child has been elevated in anyone’s mind to the level of neglect and/or abuses my answer is this:  “All abuse to children is committed because the perpetrator is mentally ill.” 

I recognize that doing to one’s children what has been done to a parent when they were a child  (the statistic is that 65% of parents who were abused do not repeat the abuse with their children although they will likely experience other kinds of complications with their parenting), periodic stress-induced out-of-control eruptions of temper against children, and even harmful parenting practices based on ignorance of developmental stages of children that prevents appropriate responses rather than hurtful ones all could be considered as being due to temporary eruptions of mental illness.  I also recognize the fact that how offspring are treated by any individual, within any family, community, culture, society, nation and species is a direct expression of degrees of health and well-being therein.  I do not recognize any excuse about why harm happens to offspring as being legitimate.  Harm happens to infants and children because we let it.

All harm done to infants and children is unfair, unjust, wrong and in the truest sense of the word, evil.  Caregivers understandably occasionally make mistakes.  Nobody on earth is perfect.  Preventing mistakes, recognizing when they happen, rectifying the harm done in any way possible and improving conditions that could lead to repetition of the mistakes are essential steps in improving conditions for infants and children.  However, in cases where there is deep underlying chronic mental illness far more attention needs to be paid to how such a mental illness affects children involved. 

In some cases, such as I would say my mother’s was children most likely need to be removed to receive adequate care elsewhere.  That our nation’s child protective services are in a pathetic shambles means that we have vast amounts of work to do before we can make the kind of progress many of our infants and children so desperately need us to make on their behalf.  Learning more about what child abuse is and how to recognize it is an important step in the right direction.

°<>°

Placing Memories

There is something very powerful and intense for me about placing memories I have carried for so long – in the case of the one that belongs right here for over 56 years – into their place in time and space within the story of my childhood.  Is this what moving toward closure feels like?  Why can’t I do this without the dread, the struggle, the effort, the work it is taking me to move forward in this book one word at a time? 

Why can’t I breeze through this?  My memories are not new to me.  In the case of this one every time it has reappeared in my thoughts it has come in exactly the same way with exactly the same details in the same order. 

While I know something now as a result of the work I have done up to this point in my writing that I did not know before, I realize that there is more for me to learn and that frightens me.  Which would be the worst part of falling through darkness?  The not knowing where bottom is or when it will be found?  Getting so close to the bottom that it can be sensed as being so close, so much closer, TOO close?  How do I stop fearing that finally stopping the fall is going to end in annihilation? 

For I do fear that so much was so wrong with Mother and so wrong with what she did to me that if I ever knew more than the infinitesimally small amount that I do about my childhood I would disintegrate.  I would disappear.  I would vanish so that no trace of me was left behind.  I fear that I might accidentally learn too much about the truth of my life, that there is a BIG BANG of discovery beyond which – if I should go that far – I will end up where I cannot return from.

Such thoughts and feelings certainly do put trepidation into my writing.  I know the writing itself teaches me things and leads to discoveries.  How much do I want to know about how Mother’s psychotic mind operated?  How can I understand what happened to me if I don’t?  How much can I allow  myself to know about what it was like for me as a small young child to be attacked by a psychotic madwoman of a mother?

How much can I trust myself that if I am still here at 61 no matter what I learn about Mother or about my traumas of my early life I will stay right here?  I am not going anywhere.  Except, temporarily, to get up from this computer yet again to walk away for a little while.

°<>°

Don’t Talk

It does not help someone like me to unravel the mysteries of what was wrong with Mother and of what my reality even from being a very young child was like – as I was unmercifully battered for doing things Mother insisted I had done that never happened anywhere at any time except within the mind of this woman who held all power over everyone in her household – when to this day I have never met a single person I can talk to about this reality.

I live in a culture where subjects considered proper for conversation seem to me to be predominantly trivial, trite and meaningless.  “Take a pill and solve your problems on your own.”  Who wants to talk about anything that matters?  Hollywood icons, sports heroes, latest fashions, new gadgets and gizmos, even stupid gossip about people qualify as appropriate subject matter for social exchange.

Don’t talk about why so many are getting drunk and getting stoned, why relationships don’t last, why 75% of our nation’s youth ages 17-24 are unfit for military duty, why a child is born into poverty every 32 seconds in our nation, why our educational system is falling apart, why multinational corporations are stealing global wealth without taxation or why our politicians are squabbling among themselves like a bunch of chickens fighting over a centipede.

I feel as though I am doing nothing more than writing a message in a bottle to be tossed three, four, five hundred years into the future.  Even then, where will the real books even be?  Is there hope mine will survive that long if I can get them into the collection of the Library of Congress?

Not one single person can I converse with about what I am considering about the demise of Mother’s mind and about what that meant to me.  Never has such a conversation happened for me in my life.  Am I prepared to accept the fact that it probably never will?

°<>°

Vendetta Against Ignorance

The psychotic look of rage upon the face and the sound of it in words as an adult attacks a child is not confined to people with a so-called diagnosable mental illness such as Mother had.  Any reader who recognizes themselves or anyone else in my words needs to STOP this behavior and get help immediately.  It is never OK to abuse infants and children for any reason – ever!  At the same time I recognize how deep-seated the problems can be in an abusive parent’s life, and how inadequate our emotional care services are.

I wrote this paragraph yesterday and was stopped dead in my writing tracks when I looked around even this community I live within and could not think of one stable, caring, competent resource person or place I could unreservedly suggest a parent or a child in need could turn to for any promise of adequate assistance.  I tried to think in broader terms for “people at large” to turn to should they need help with what troubles them in their self and in their life when it comes to meeting their needs to stop harming children.  I found nothing but empty holes where services to truly support families and children should but do not exist.

Why do I continue to wonder why no one noticed what was happening to me when I was a suffering child?  Why do I write believing anything I say will help anyone anywhere in any way?  What is it about me that believes I among billions on this earth knows anything that matters?  What hope have I always carried within me that if the truth was really known about how lovely the inner life of a child is everyone would care enough to make sure nobody ever hurt them ever?

What grownups care enough to clear the path ahead of a growing infant-child so that harmful obstacles do not cause them to trip and fall until somewhere down the road of their life they end up lying on the floor like Mother did in her later years unable to get up?

What macabre culture have we created that chooses shortsightedness over long range considerations about what leads to individual and then societal well-being?  Why do we bother to have children at all if so few even want them?  Are they possessions?  Are they carrion?

Who decides who is who and what do we want for our nation’s future?

What do we consider to be acceptable losses?  What is wrong with us as a society that we would consider the life of any child who, if they reach adulthood having suffered from avoidable harm against them in their critical stages of development will be barred from experiencing the well-being that was their birthright (see CDC ACE study pyramid) and be a candidate for being one of our acceptable losses?

I cannot write to expose the combination of factors within the family I grew up in as they created long-term horrific abuse of me as a child – that not one single person ever noticed with concern – without questioning the gamut of societal sicknesses that allowed Mother to do what she did to me for 18 years.  There is a collusion of uncaring ignorance in our society that fosters the conditions within which harm to infants and children continues to exist.  It is my personal vendetta against that ignorance that motivates me to write my truth.  I will be content if my work furthers the education of someone even if that someone is only me.

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

Please click here to read or to Leave a Comment »

++++

 

+CHAPTER 10, BOOK 2 OF “THE DARK SIDE OF MILDRED’S MOUNTAIN” (‘Angel’)

The Dark Side of Mildred’s Mountain series – Angel book 2 beginning with the POP!  Goes Alaska letters – chapter 10

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

10.  Dreaming Books

March 23, 2013.  I woke this morning when my hens began cackling outside my bedroom window just before daybreak remembering a dream.  I began having dreams that were important to my ongoing life the winter I was 9 in 4th grade.  I will write about that transition in my development when I get to that part of my story, 1960 to 1961.

In 1998 when I was 47 I had the last dream in what seems to be a series that lasted through all those years.  In 1997 I had realized, finally, how much more I preferred the world in my dreams than I did my waking life.  My attitude troubled me enough that I suspect in some ways I stopped remembering my dreams through my own choice.  However, I also wonder if my dreaming history as it began three years before my menarche and ended three years before my menopause possibly had something to do with the healing, enervating, soothing and very helpful influence of estrogen – until this benefit departed.

Although I very seldom remember any aspect of my dreams now, occasionally one of their themes carries through to my waking awareness, as happened this morning.  I feel blessed both by the nature of the dream and by my recollection of it.  I can think of no people I would rather have had appear in my dreams and no better outcome than the one I was shown today!

Our homesteading neighbors will be introduced in Mildred’s letters beginning in 1959.  Among the ones most important to the success of our family’s venture were the people who lived closest to us at the bottom of “our” mountain, Lowell and Dorothy Pollard and their two young sons.  I last saw these people the summer of 1969 before I left home after my 18th birthday that fall. 

It was through Dorothy’s homesteading book which she thoughtfully gave a copy of to each of us Lloyd children that she and I connected in 2008.  Eight Stars of Gold:  Notes from a Mid-Century Alaska Homestead Journal (2008, Vantage Press) is, according to Joe Anne Vanover, who is a lifetime Alaskan and herself a homesteader, “one of the loveliest accounts of homesteading ever written.”  Interestingly, although Joe Anne and her deceased husband John were good friends with Lowell (who passed from this world nearly 20 years ago), they never met Dorothy.  I am greatly honored to be in contact with both of these astounding women who are now past their mid-80s.

°<>°

The season of my dream was a warm one.  I had no battle with snow and ice as I repeatedly walked a long road upon rich black soil into the Eagle River Valley that led to Pollards’ inviting cabin – and then back out again.  Dorothy was lovingly caring for my siblings while I worked on my task.  Sharon was 2, Cindy 4, and John was 7 in my dream just as they were at this current 1957 stage in the Lloyd family story.  I was the age I am now.

Lowell was slumbering peacefully in a quiet part of the house as my contented siblings benefited from Dorothy’s tending.  In the dream I hiked many times to their house to lay the next completed book on the ground at the base of a thick root that arched out of the soil under a large spruce tree that grew to the left as I came up the gentle slope of Pollards’ driveway.  Each time I entered the house, paused for a brief visit with Dorothy, checked on my siblings and then left again to hike back out of the valley.

At the end of the dream I returned to place the final book I had written on top of the tall pile of volumes stacked neatly at the base of the spruce tree.  As I entered Pollards’ house Lowell, looking rested and relaxed, sauntered into the cheerful kitchen yawning and stretching luxuriously.  When he saw me a wide grin flashed across his face as he spoke the only words I remember from this dream, “Hi, Linda!  How are ya doin’?”

°<>°

This dream cheered, comforted and encouraged me.  I no longer feel so alone in my work, and I can visualize completing it.  This dream clarified how I see my siblings in relation to this task of telling my trauma story within Mother’s words.  I want them to be innocent, free from any burden, safe, happy, content and lovingly cared for while I busily complete these books.

When it comes to my question, “Whose book is this?”  I now know a lot more than I did yesterday because of this dream.  Ultimately this story belongs to the earth.  I will lay it down.  I will offer it.  I will let it go.  Somehow I tell this story for my siblings as well as for myself.  Something about this task is rectifying to me, as if its completion can in some way even help to heal my parents.

This is a sharing story.  The Lloyd family members were the participants in the story as it was lived – so that it can now be told.  These books are a gift to all who might learn something new and useful from reading them, even if the only lesson some readers come to understand is that adults who survived hellacious childhoods of abuse and trauma will NEVER be able to leave their childhood in the past as many uniformed and misinformed people seem to believe that we can.

I feel refreshed, restored, reinvigorated and very hopeful now that this journey is right for me, that it is good, that the books will bring benefit, even that they are a gift to all of us being brought forth through the writings of Mildred and myself.  I am dedicated.  I know how to focus.  I know how to work.  All that remains for me to concern myself with is the writing of these books.  I need fear no longer.

All life belong to the Creator.  The Creator.  The Great Mystery.  The greatest storyteller Who began all stories with, “In the beginning was the Word.”

To be the writer of a truly tragic tale who makes its story beautiful would require a great gift.  I will do my best, with gratitude, to be so worthy.

°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°<>°

Please click here to read or to Leave a Comment »

++++